AI 相关诉讼
SAFETY可信度与安全把公开的安全信息集中到一处:前沿模型的系统卡与安全评估文档、AI 技术栈的公开漏洞、AI 相关恶意包与 IOC、正在进行的 AI 相关诉讼。四个分区各有独立地址与数据源,全部条目都给出原始出处。
本站收录 54 件 AI 相关诉讼与监管程序,其中 42 件仍在进行中,8 件已有驳回、判决或和解结果;案件分布在 20 个辖区,最新立案时间为 2026-10-08。全部内容为依据公开案卷与新闻报道的编辑摘要,不构成法律意见。
筛选与排序
AI 相关诉讼状态、阶段与诉求分布
7 个审理阶段案件状态
进行中(active)
42 件点击筛出该状态的案件
点击筛出该状态的案件
已判决(judgment)
4 件点击筛出该状态的案件
已驳回(dismissed)
2 件点击筛出该状态的案件
已和解(settled)
2 件点击筛出该状态的案件
审理阶段
起诉(complaint)
15 件点击筛出该阶段的案件
证据开示(discovery)
15 件点击筛出该阶段的案件
上诉(appeal)
8 件点击筛出该阶段的案件
点击筛出该阶段的案件
点击筛出该阶段的案件
已结案(closed)
3 件点击筛出该阶段的案件
庭审(trial)
1 件点击筛出该阶段的案件
诉求类型 Top 8
点击筛出该诉求的案件
点击筛出该诉求的案件
点击筛出该诉求的案件
侵权之诉(tort)
7 件点击筛出该诉求的案件
点击筛出该诉求的案件
点击筛出该诉求的案件
点击筛出该诉求的案件
反垄断(antitrust)
2 件点击筛出该诉求的案件
诉讼明细
显示 7 / 54 件| 案件 | 原告 | 被告 | 辖区 | 立案 | 状态 | 阶段 | 诉求 | 摘要 | 案卷 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X.AI Corp. v. OpenAI (trade secrets) 3:25-cv-08133 (9th Cir. No. 26-4486) | X.AI Corp. | OpenAI, Inc. and affiliated entities | US (N.D. Cal.; 9th Cir.) | 2025-09-24 | 已驳回(dismissed) | 上诉(appeal) | 不正当竞争(unfair-competition) | xAI alleged OpenAI misappropriated its trade secrets. Judge Rita Lin dismissed the amended complaint with leave to amend in February 2026, then dismissed the case without leave to… | 案卷 → |
| Nikkei & Asahi Shimbun v. Perplexity AI 案号未标注 | Nikkei Inc.; The Asahi Shimbun Company | Perplexity AI, Inc. | Japan | 2025-08-26 | 进行中(active) | 驳回动议(motion-to-dismiss) | 版权侵权(copyright-infringement)、不正当竞争(unfair-competition) | The two publishers seek an injunction, deletion of stored articles, and 2.2 billion yen each in damages, alleging Perplexity ignored robots.txt, copied articles including paywalled… | 案卷 → |
| X Corp. & xAI v. Apple and OpenAI (antitrust) 4:25-cv-00914 | X Corp.; X.AI LLC (recaptioned SpaceXAI LLC in August 2026) | Apple Inc.、OpenAI, Inc. and affiliated entities | US (N.D. Tex.) | 2025-08-25 | 进行中(active) | 证据开示(discovery) | 反垄断(antitrust)、不正当竞争(unfair-competition) | X and xAI bring antitrust, unfair competition, and civil conspiracy claims against Apple and OpenAI over their partnership. Judge Pittman denied the motions to dismiss on November… | 案卷 → |
| Getty Images (US) v. Stability AI 3:25-cv-06891 (originally D. Del. 1:23-cv-00135) | Getty Images (US), Inc. | Stability AI, Inc.、Stability AI Ltd. | US (N.D. Cal.) | 2025-08-14 | 进行中(active) | 证据开示(discovery) | 版权侵权(copyright-infringement)、商标侵权(trademark-infringement)、不正当竞争(unfair-competition)、DMCA 违规(dmca-violation) | Getty alleges Stable Diffusion was trained on millions of Getty images and reproduces the Getty watermark in some generations. Getty voluntarily dismissed its February 2023 Delawar… | 案卷 → |
| Reddit, Inc. v. Anthropic PBC CGC-25-625892 | Reddit, Inc. | Anthropic PBC | US (California state court) | 2025-06-04 | 进行中(active) | 起诉(complaint) | 违约(breach-of-contract)、不当得利(unjust-enrichment)、不正当竞争(unfair-competition)、侵权之诉(tort) | Reddit alleges Anthropic used Reddit content without permission and in breach of Reddit's user agreement. Anthropic removed the case to federal court, but in March 2026 Judge Trina… | 案卷 → |
| Dow Jones & NYP Holdings v. Perplexity AI 1:24-cv-07984 | Dow Jones & Company; NYP Holdings (News Corp) | Perplexity AI, Inc. | US (S.D.N.Y.) | 2024-10-21 | 进行中(active) | 证据开示(discovery) | 版权侵权(copyright-infringement)、不正当竞争(unfair-competition)、商标侵权(trademark-infringement) | WSJ and NY Post owners allege Perplexity's answer engine copies and republishes their reporting verbatim and falsely attributes its summaries. Judge Failla denied Perplexity's moti… | 案卷 → |
| The New York Times Co. v. Microsoft Corp. & OpenAI 1:23-cv-11195 (part of MDL No. 3143) | The New York Times Company | Microsoft Corporation、OpenAI, Inc.、OpenAI LP、OpenAI GP | US (S.D.N.Y.) | 2023-12-27 | 进行中(active) | 简易判决(summary-judgment) | 版权侵权(copyright-infringement)、DMCA 违规(dmca-violation)、不正当竞争(unfair-competition) | NYT alleges OpenAI and Microsoft trained GPT-class models on millions of NYT articles without license and that ChatGPT outputs reproduce articles verbatim. Since April 2025 it has… | 案卷 → |
数据说明
常见问题
这些案件信息能当法律依据用吗?
不能。这里是依据公开案卷与新闻报道整理的编辑摘要,可能滞后于程序进展,也不构成法律意见。正式用途请以法院案卷(如 CourtListener)与当事方公告为准,必要时咨询执业律师。
「状态」和「审理阶段」有什么区别?
状态是粗粒度结果(进行中 / 已结案);审理阶段是程序走到哪一步(立案、答辩、证据开示、庭审、判决或和解),同样「进行中」的两个案子,阶段可能差得很远。
为什么有些知名案件没有收录?
收录以能查到的公开案卷与报道为准,覆盖并不完整、也可能滞后;没有收录不代表案件不存在。
诉求类型(版权 / 商标 / 反垄断…)怎么理解?
按原告主张的法律依据归类。同一案件常同时主张多种诉求,所以各类型的计数相加会大于案件总数。
安全信息取自各实验室官方发布页与公开漏洞库;本页条目的原始出处见每条链接。