Ise Posture Audit

SKILL商业运营
商业运营 未标注权限 许可证不明确

Cisco ISE posture and policy audit - authorization rules, posture compliance, profiling gaps, TrustSec SGT matrix, active session health. Use when running a periodic ISE compliance audit, reviewing authorization policies for over-permissiveness, checking TrustSec segmentation, assessing endpoint profiling accuracy, or preparing for SOC2 or PCI-DSS review.

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

Ise Posture Audit是商业运营类的 Agent Skill,安装方式:GitHub 仓库,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,没有现成安装命令,需按说明手动放置 SKILL.md。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类商业运营 安装方式GitHub 仓库 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 netclaw
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

GitHub 仓库
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    按安装说明或仓库 README,把 SKILL.md 放到客户端的 skills 目录(一般一个技能一个文件夹)。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

商业运营
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方automateyournetwork仓库 netclaw · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式GitHub 仓库安装包 automateyournetwork/netclaw
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 2026-09-27
正文体量11.6 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
写运营方案

按目标产出活动方案与执行清单。

分析数据与指标

从报表里找问题、给结论。

整理客户与销售材料

把客户信息与话术整理成可直接用的材料。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 基础信息齐全,可以先按说明装一个试试。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有现成安装命令,要按安装说明或仓库 README 手动放置。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在商业运营场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
Ise Posture Audit当前 未标注权限 GitHub 仓库 未标注 未标注 无
MX 股票筛选器 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 79.9 万 OpenClaw 有
交易 未标注权限 ClawHub 市场 58.1 万 OpenClaw 有
营销技巧 只读 ClawHub 市场 54.0 万 OpenClaw 有
百灵鸟好 联网访问 GitHub 仓库 52.6 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
股票信息浏览器 接触敏感数据 ClawHub 市场 40.5 万 OpenClaw 有

SKILL.md 全文

11.6 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

ISE Posture and Policy Audit

When to Use

  • Periodic ISE policy compliance audit (SOC2, PCI-DSS, NIST 800-53, HIPAA)
  • Pre-deployment review before onboarding new endpoint types
  • Post-incident review to identify policy gaps that allowed lateral movement
  • TrustSec segmentation validation
  • Profiling accuracy assessment after network changes
  • Quarterly access control hygiene check

How to Call the ISE MCP Tools

All ISE tools are called via mcp-call with the ISE MCP server command:

ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT" TOOL_NAME '{"param":"value"}'

Audit Procedure

Step 1: Clear Cache and Establish Baseline

Start every audit with a fresh cache to ensure current data:

ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT" clear_cache '{}'

Verify connectivity and cache state:

ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT" get_cache_stats '{}'

Step 2: Authorization Policy Review

Pull all policy sets, then drill into authorization rules:

ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT" network_access_policy_set '{}'
ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT" network_access_authorization_rules '{}'
ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT" network_access_authentication_rules '{}'
ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT" network_access_conditions '{}'

Authorization Policy Checks:

Check What to Look For Severity If Found
Default Allow Default rule granting PermitAccess or DenyAccess without conditions CRITICAL
Overly permissive rules AuthZ rules with no posture condition and full network access CRITICAL
Stale rules Rules referencing deleted/unused identity groups or conditions HIGH
Rule ordering Permissive rules ranked above restrictive rules (shadowing) HIGH
Missing posture check AuthZ rules that grant access without posture assessment MEDIUM
Duplicate conditions Multiple rules with identical match criteria LOW

Step 3: Posture Compliance Assessment

Review endpoints and identity groups to identify posture gaps:

ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT" endpoints '{}'
ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT" identity_groups '{}'

Posture Compliance Checks:

Check What to Look For Severity If Found
Endpoints bypassing posture Endpoints with full access but no posture assessment recorded CRITICAL
Non-compliant endpoints on network Endpoints marked non-compliant but not quarantined CRITICAL
Missing posture policy for endpoint type Endpoint categories (BYOD, IoT, contractor) without posture rules HIGH
Posture reassessment interval No periodic reassessment configured (one-time posture only) MEDIUM
Unknown endpoints with access Endpoints in "Unknown" group with network access beyond guest HIGH

Step 4: Profiling Coverage Analysis

Assess how well ISE is profiling connected endpoints:

ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT" profiler_profiles '{}'

Cross-reference with the endpoint list from Step 3.

Profiling Checks:

Check What to Look For Severity If Found
Unknown endpoint ratio More than 10% of endpoints profiled as "Unknown" HIGH
Unmatched profiles Custom profiles with zero matched endpoints (dead profiles) LOW
Missing critical profiles No profiles for known device types on the network (printers, phones, cameras) MEDIUM
Profile certainty Endpoints with low certainty factor (< 20) receiving production access HIGH
Profiling probe coverage Insufficient probe types enabled for accurate classification MEDIUM

Step 5: TrustSec SGT Matrix Analysis

Review Security Group Tags and their access control:

ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL &quot;python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT&quot; trustsec_sgts &#x27;{}&#x27;
ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL &quot;python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT&quot; trustsec_sgacls &#x27;{}&#x27;
ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL &quot;python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT&quot; trustsec_egress_matrix_cell &#x27;{}&#x27;

TrustSec Checks:

Check What to Look For Severity If Found
Permit-all SGACLs SGACLs with permit ip (no restrictions between segments) CRITICAL
Missing matrix cells SGT-to-SGT pairs with no defined policy (defaults to permit or deny?) HIGH
Unused SGTs SGTs defined but assigned to zero endpoints LOW
Overly broad SGTs Single SGT assigned to endpoints with different trust levels HIGH
No deny logging SGACLs with deny rules but no log keyword MEDIUM
Flat segmentation Fewer than 3 SGTs defined (minimal micro-segmentation) HIGH

Step 6: Active Session Health

Review current active sessions for anomalies:

ISE_BASE=$ISE_BASE USERNAME=$ISE_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ISE_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL &quot;python3 -u $ISE_MCP_SCRIPT&quot; active_sessions &#x27;{}&#x27;

Session Health Checks:

Check What to Look For Severity If Found
Long-lived sessions Sessions active for > 24 hours without reauthentication MEDIUM
Failed auth spikes Multiple failed authentications from same MAC/IP in short window HIGH
Guest on production VLAN Guest-profiled endpoints on non-guest VLANs CRITICAL
Multiple MACs per port More than expected endpoints on a single switchport (hub or rogue AP) HIGH
Auth method mismatch Endpoints using MAB when 802.1X is expected for that device type MEDIUM

Severity Rating Criteria

CRITICAL -- Immediate risk of unauthorized access or data exfiltration:
- Default permit-all authorization rules
- Non-compliant endpoints with unrestricted access
- Guest endpoints on production VLANs
- Permit-all SGACLs between untrusted and trusted segments

HIGH -- Significant policy gap that could be exploited:
- Unknown endpoints with production access
- Missing TrustSec matrix entries
- Stale or shadowed authorization rules
- Low-certainty profiling with production access

MEDIUM -- Policy weakness that should be addressed this cycle:
- Missing posture reassessment
- Auth method mismatches
- Insufficient profiling probes
- Long-lived sessions without reauth

LOW -- Housekeeping and hygiene items:
- Unused SGTs or dead profiles
- Duplicate authorization conditions
- Minor documentation gaps

Audit Report Format

ISE Posture Audit Report
ISE Deployment: $ISE_BASE
Audit Date: YYYY-MM-DD

CRITICAL FINDINGS (Immediate Action Required):
  1. [C-001] Default AuthZ rule grants PermitAccess — all unmatched endpoints get full access
  2. [C-002] 14 endpoints marked non-compliant but not quarantined
  3. [C-003] SGACL &quot;Permit_All&quot; applied to IoT-to-Server matrix cell

HIGH FINDINGS (Address This Week):
  4. [H-001] 23% of endpoints profiled as &quot;Unknown&quot; — profiling gap
  5. [H-002] SGT &quot;Employees&quot; assigned to both corporate laptops and contractor devices
  6. [H-003] 3 authorization rules shadowed by permissive rule at rank 1

MEDIUM FINDINGS (Address This Month):
  7. [M-001] No posture reassessment configured — one-time check only
  8. [M-002] 47 sessions active &gt; 24h without reauthentication
  9. [M-003] 12 endpoints using MAB instead of expected 802.1X

LOW / INFORMATIONAL:
  10. [L-001] 5 unused SGTs: &quot;Test_SGT&quot;, &quot;Legacy_Printers&quot;, etc.
  11. [L-002] 3 profiler profiles with zero matched endpoints

Summary: 3 Critical | 3 High | 3 Medium | 2 Low

Policy Sets Reviewed: N
Authorization Rules Reviewed: N
Endpoints Analyzed: N
SGTs Evaluated: N
Active Sessions Checked: N

Integration with Other Skills

  • Use pyats-security to verify device-side 802.1X configuration matches ISE policy (RADIUS server config, dot1x port settings, CoPP for RADIUS traffic)
  • Use gait-session-tracking to record the full audit in the GAIT immutable audit trail
  • Use markmap-viz to visualize the ISE policy hierarchy (Policy Sets > AuthZ Rules > Conditions > Results)
  • Use ise-incident-response when a CRITICAL finding requires immediate endpoint investigation
  • Use servicenow-change-workflow to create Change Requests for ISE policy remediation

GAIT Audit Trail

After completing the audit, record the session in GAIT:

python3 $MCP_CALL &quot;python3 -u $GAIT_MCP_SCRIPT&quot; gait_record_turn &#x27;{&quot;user_text&quot;:&quot;Example only: replace with the actual authorized request.&quot;,&quot;assistant_text&quot;:&quot;ISE posture audit completed. ISE: $ISE_BASE. Findings: 3 CRITICAL, 3 HIGH, 3 MEDIUM, 2 LOW. Critical items: default permit-all AuthZ rule, 14 non-compliant endpoints not quarantined, permit-all SGACL on IoT-to-Server cell.&quot;,&quot;artifacts&quot;:[]}&#x27;

Markmap Visualization

Generate a policy hierarchy mind map for the audit report:

python3 $MCP_CALL &quot;node $MARKMAP_MCP_SCRIPT&quot; markmap_customize &#x27;{&quot;markdown_content&quot;:&quot;# ISE Policy Audit\n## CRITICAL\n### Default AuthZ permits all\n### Non-compliant endpoints active\n### Permit-all SGACL\n## HIGH\n### 23% Unknown endpoints\n### SGT overlap (employees + contractors)\n### Shadowed AuthZ rules\n## MEDIUM\n### No posture reassessment\n### Long-lived sessions\n### MAB instead of 802.1X\n## LOW\n### Unused SGTs\n### Dead profiler profiles&quot;,&quot;theme&quot;:&quot;dark&quot;}&#x27;

Failure Behavior

  • If a tool call fails with an authentication or connection error, check that GAIT_MCP_SCRIPT, ISE_BASE, ISE_MCP_SCRIPT, ISE_PASSWORD, ISE_USERNAME, MARKMAP_MCP_SCRIPT are set and valid before assuming a data or device problem.
  • On a tool error (timeout, unreachable host, malformed response), report the failure and its error message directly to the user rather than fabricating or guessing at results.
  • For a confirmed read-only call, check connectivity and retry once if appropriate. For any call that changes state or sends a message, a timeout does not prove the action failed: inspect current state or delivery status before retrying, preserve the required approval/change gates, and do not repeat an action whose outcome is unknown.

Audit examples are illustrative. Replace request, outcomes, identifiers and counts
with observed session evidence; do not record these example results as facts.
Inspect MCP isError, returned ok, and the recorded turn with gait_show when
validating a new client/schema. Follow gait-session-tracking for branch checkout.

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
Ise Posture Audit怎么安装?

没有现成安装命令:按安装说明或仓库 README,把 SKILL.md 放进客户端的 skills 目录(一般一个技能一个文件夹)。

Ise Posture Audit支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

Ise Posture Audit权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

Ise Posture Audit收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

Ise Posture Audit用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。