Aci Fabric Audit

SKILL开发规范
开发规范 未标注权限 许可证不明确

Comprehensive Cisco ACI fabric health audit - node status, tenant/VRF/BD/EPG policy review, contract analysis, fault triage, and endpoint learning verification. Use when auditing ACI fabric health, checking for faults, reviewing tenant policies, or running pre/post-change baselines on APIC.

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

Aci Fabric Audit是开发规范类的 Agent Skill,安装方式:GitHub 仓库,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,没有现成安装命令,需按说明手动放置 SKILL.md。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类开发规范 安装方式GitHub 仓库 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 netclaw
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

GitHub 仓库
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    按安装说明或仓库 README,把 SKILL.md 放到客户端的 skills 目录(一般一个技能一个文件夹)。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

开发规范
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方automateyournetwork仓库 netclaw · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式GitHub 仓库安装包 automateyournetwork/netclaw
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 2026-09-27
正文体量11.2 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
统一代码规范

把团队约定写成模型能执行的检查项。

做代码审查

按规范逐条检查改动。

写提交与文档规范

统一提交信息与文档模板。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 基础信息齐全,可以先按说明装一个试试。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有现成安装命令,要按安装说明或仓库 README 手动放置。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在开发规范场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
Aci Fabric Audit当前 未标注权限 GitHub 仓库 未标注 未标注 无
Firebase auth basics 邮件管理 接触敏感数据 GitHub 仓库 89.6 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
时差 联网访问 GitHub 仓库 79.8 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
内存卫生 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 67.9 万 OpenClaw 有
及时的工程专家 只读 ClawHub 市场 55.8 万 OpenClaw 有
FastAPI templates 测试 联网访问 GitHub 仓库 37.2 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有

SKILL.md 全文

11.2 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

ACI Fabric Health Audit

How to Call the ACI MCP Tools

All ACI tool calls use mcp-call with environment variables set as a prefix:

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" TOOL_NAME '{"param":"value"}'

When to Use

  • Scheduled daily/weekly fabric health checks
  • Pre-change baseline capture before any ACI policy modification
  • Post-change validation to confirm no new faults appeared
  • Incident response when ACI-related alerts fire
  • Compliance audits for tenant policy and contract hygiene
  • Capacity planning for leaf/spine utilization

Audit Procedure

Always run the audit in this exact order. Each phase builds on the previous one.

Phase 1: Fabric Node Health

Verify all leaf and spine switches are registered, healthy, and running expected firmware.

1A: Enumerate Fabric Nodes

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" fabric_nodes '{}'

Extract and report:
- Node ID, name, role (leaf/spine/controller), serial number
- Admin state and operational state
- Fabric firmware version
- Model and TEP address

Flags:
- Node operational state != "available" -> CRITICAL
- Mixed firmware versions across same role -> WARNING
- Node decommissioned or inactive -> WARNING

1B: Fabric Pods

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" fabric_pods '{}'

Verify all pods are healthy and reachable.

1C: Fabric Links

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" fabric_links '{}'

Flags:
- Link operState != "up" -> CRITICAL: Fabric interconnect down
- Single-homed spine (only one link) -> WARNING: No redundancy

Phase 2: Tenant / VRF / BD / EPG Policy Audit

Systematically walk the ACI policy tree from tenant down to EPG.

2A: Enumerate All Tenants

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" tenants_get '{}'

Record the full tenant list. Flag any unexpected tenants (not in the approved tenant registry).

2B: VRF Contexts per Tenant

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" fvCtx_get '{}'

Flags:
- VRF with pcEnfPref set to "unenforced" -> WARNING: No contract enforcement
- VRF with no bridge domains attached -> WARNING: Orphaned VRF

2C: Bridge Domains

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" fvBD_get '{}'

Flags:
- BD with unicastRoute disabled -> WARNING: No L3 routing
- BD with arpFlood enabled and limitIpLearnToSubnets disabled -> WARNING: Broadcast storm risk
- BD not associated with any VRF -> CRITICAL: Misconfiguration
- BD with no subnets -> WARNING: L2-only BD, verify intentional

2D: Application Profiles

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" fvAp_get '{}'

Enumerate application profiles to understand the logical grouping of EPGs.

2E: Endpoint Groups

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" fvAEPg_get '{}'

Flags:
- EPG with no static bindings and no VMM domain -> WARNING: No path to physical or virtual infra
- EPG with no contracts (neither consumer nor provider) -> WARNING: Isolated EPG, no communication possible
- EPG with floodOnEncap enabled -> WARNING: Potential broadcast issues

Phase 3: Contract Analysis

Audit contracts for security hygiene -- look for overly permissive rules and unused contracts.

3A: List All Contracts

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" contracts_get '{}'

Flags:
- Contract with scope "global" and subject filter permitting all (ether type unspecified) -> CRITICAL: Any-to-any rule
- Contract with no subjects -> WARNING: Empty contract, no rules defined
- Contract with no consumers or no providers -> WARNING: Unused contract
- Contract scope "tenant" with cross-tenant consumer -> WARNING: Verify intent

3B: Analyze Contract Subjects and Filters

For each contract returned, inspect the subjects and filters. Look for:
- Filters allowing IP protocol 0 (unspecified) -> CRITICAL: Permits all traffic
- Filters allowing TCP/UDP with dFromPort=0 and dToPort=65535 -> WARNING: Full port range open
- Taboo contracts with broad deny rules -> INFO: Document these for compliance

Phase 4: Fault Analysis

4A: Retrieve All Faults

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" faults '{}'

Categorize and count by severity:

Severity Action
critical Immediate triage required
major Schedule remediation within 24 hours
minor Review in next maintenance window
warning Informational, track trending

Flags:
- Any critical faults -> CRITICAL: Report immediately
- Major fault count > 10 -> WARNING: Systemic issue suspected
- Faults with lifecycle "raised" (not acknowledged) -> WARNING: Unacknowledged faults

4B: Health Scores

APIC_URL=$APIC_URL USERNAME=$ACI_USERNAME PASSWORD=$ACI_PASSWORD python3 $MCP_CALL "python3 -u $ACI_MCP_SCRIPT" health '{}'

Thresholds:
- Health score >= 95 -> HEALTHY
- Health score 80-94 -> WARNING
- Health score 60-79 -> HIGH
- Health score < 60 -> CRITICAL

Phase 5: Endpoint Learning Verification

Verify that endpoints are being learned correctly across the fabric.

5A: Check Endpoint Learning

Look for:
- Duplicate MAC addresses learned on different leaves -> CRITICAL: Possible loop
- Endpoints bouncing between ports (frequent EP moves) -> WARNING: Instability
- Static endpoints not present in the endpoint table -> WARNING: Connectivity issue

Audit Report Format

Always produce a consolidated summary:

ACI Fabric Audit Report
========================
APIC: $APIC_URL
Timestamp: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM UTC

Fabric Summary
--------------
Pods: 1 | Nodes: 6 (2 spine, 4 leaf) | All nodes available: YES
Firmware: 6.0(3e) uniform across all nodes

Policy Summary
--------------
Tenants: 5 | VRFs: 8 | BDs: 23 | App Profiles: 12 | EPGs: 47

+--------------------+----------+----------------------------------+
| Check              | Status   | Details                          |
+--------------------+----------+----------------------------------+
| Fabric Nodes       | HEALTHY  | 6/6 nodes available              |
| Fabric Links       | HEALTHY  | All inter-switch links up        |
| Tenant Policy      | WARNING  | 2 EPGs with no contracts         |
| VRF Enforcement    | HEALTHY  | All VRFs enforced                |
| Bridge Domains     | WARNING  | 1 BD with no subnet              |
| Contracts          | CRITICAL | 1 any-to-any contract found      |
| Faults (Critical)  | HEALTHY  | 0 critical faults                |
| Faults (Major)     | WARNING  | 3 major faults (unacknowledged)  |
| Health Score       | HEALTHY  | 97/100                           |
| Endpoint Learning  | HEALTHY  | No duplicate MACs detected       |
+--------------------+----------+----------------------------------+

Overall: WARNING -- 4 items need attention, 1 CRITICAL contract issue

Critical Findings
-----------------
1. [CRITICAL] Contract &quot;default&quot; in tenant &quot;prod&quot; permits all traffic
   - Scope: global | Subject filter: implicit-allow
   - Recommendation: Replace with explicit per-port filters

2. [WARNING] EPG &quot;web-servers&quot; in tenant &quot;prod&quot; has no provider contracts
   - No inbound communication path defined
   - Recommendation: Attach appropriate provider contract

3. [WARNING] BD &quot;legacy-bd&quot; has no subnet configured
   - L2-only mode, verify this is intentional
   ...

Severity order: CRITICAL > HIGH > WARNING > HEALTHY. Overall status = worst individual status.

Integration with Other Skills

GAIT Audit Trail

After completing the audit, record the session in GAIT:

python3 $MCP_CALL &quot;python3 -u $GAIT_MCP_SCRIPT&quot; gait_record_turn &#x27;{&quot;user_text&quot;:&quot;Example only: replace with the actual authorized request.&quot;,&quot;assistant_text&quot;:&quot;ACI fabric audit completed on APIC $APIC_URL: Nodes HEALTHY (6/6), Policy WARNING (2 EPGs no contracts), Contracts CRITICAL (1 any-to-any), Faults WARNING (3 major), Health 97/100. Overall: WARNING.&quot;,&quot;artifacts&quot;:[]}&#x27;

Markmap Tenant Hierarchy

Generate an interactive mind map of the tenant hierarchy:

python3 $MCP_CALL &quot;node $MARKMAP_MCP_SCRIPT&quot; markmap_generate &#x27;{&quot;markdown_content&quot;:&quot;# ACI Fabric\n## Tenant: prod\n### VRF: prod-vrf\n#### BD: web-bd\n##### EPG: web-servers\n##### EPG: app-servers\n#### BD: db-bd\n##### EPG: db-servers\n## Tenant: shared\n### VRF: shared-l3out\n#### BD: external-bd&quot;}&#x27;

Draw.io Fabric Topology

Generate a visual fabric topology diagram:

python3 $MCP_CALL &quot;npx -y @drawio/mcp&quot; open_drawio_mermaid &#x27;{&quot;content&quot;:&quot;graph TD\n  subgraph \&quot;Pod 1\&quot;\n    APIC1[\&quot;APIC-1\&quot;]\n    S1[\&quot;Spine-1\&quot;]\n    S2[\&quot;Spine-2\&quot;]\n    L1[\&quot;Leaf-1\&quot;]\n    L2[\&quot;Leaf-2\&quot;]\n    L3[\&quot;Leaf-3\&quot;]\n    L4[\&quot;Leaf-4\&quot;]\n    S1 --- L1\n    S1 --- L2\n    S1 --- L3\n    S1 --- L4\n    S2 --- L1\n    S2 --- L2\n    S2 --- L3\n    S2 --- L4\n  end&quot;}&#x27;

Output

The audit produces:
1. A structured text report with severity ratings per check area
2. A list of critical findings with actionable recommendations
3. Optional markmap visualization of tenant hierarchy
4. Optional Draw.io diagram of fabric topology
5. GAIT audit trail entry for compliance records

Failure Behavior

  • If a tool call fails with an authentication or connection error, check that ACI_MCP_SCRIPT, ACI_PASSWORD, ACI_USERNAME, APIC_URL, GAIT_MCP_SCRIPT, MARKMAP_MCP_SCRIPT are set and valid before assuming a data or device problem.
  • On a tool error (timeout, unreachable host, malformed response), report the failure and its error message directly to the user rather than fabricating or guessing at results.
  • For a confirmed read-only call, check connectivity and retry once if appropriate. For any call that changes state or sends a message, a timeout does not prove the action failed: inspect current state or delivery status before retrying, preserve the required approval/change gates, and do not repeat an action whose outcome is unknown.

Audit examples are illustrative. Replace request, outcomes, identifiers and counts
with observed session evidence; do not record these example results as facts.
Inspect MCP isError, returned ok, and the recorded turn with gait_show when
validating a new client/schema. Follow gait-session-tracking for branch checkout.

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
Aci Fabric Audit怎么安装?

没有现成安装命令:按安装说明或仓库 README,把 SKILL.md 放进客户端的 skills 目录(一般一个技能一个文件夹)。

Aci Fabric Audit支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

Aci Fabric Audit权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

Aci Fabric Audit收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

Aci Fabric Audit用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。