debate

SKILL开发
开发 未标注权限 许可证不明确

Multi-LLM debate orchestration (Claude vs Codex vs Gemini) with rounds + synthesis.

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

debate是开发类的 Agent Skill,安装方式:GitHub 仓库,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,没有现成安装命令,需按说明手动放置 SKILL.md。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类开发 安装方式GitHub 仓库 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 33 仓库 claude-skills
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

GitHub 仓库
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    按安装说明或仓库 README,把 SKILL.md 放到客户端的 skills 目录(一般一个技能一个文件夹)。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

开发
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方wolverin0仓库 claude-skills · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式GitHub 仓库安装包 wolverin0/claude-skills
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 未标注
正文体量9.0 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
写代码与改 bug

按需求补代码、定位并修掉报错。

读仓库与生成改动

让模型读懂项目结构,再给出可落地的改动。

跑测试与排查故障

按现象排查问题,补测试用例并复跑。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 基础信息齐全,可以先按说明装一个试试。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有现成安装命令,要按安装说明或仓库 README 手动放置。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在开发场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
debate当前 未标注权限 GitHub 仓库 未标注 未标注 无
技能审查员 浏览器控制 ClawHub 市场 877.9 万 OpenClaw 有
Vercel React 最佳实践 浏览器控制 GitHub 仓库 849.1 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
GitHub 代码协作 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 763.3 万 OpenClaw 有
网页设计指南 联网访问 GitHub 仓库 668.6 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
本体论 只读 ClawHub 市场 663.7 万 OpenClaw 有

SKILL.md 全文

9.0 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

AI Debate Hub Skill v6.0.0

You are Claude, a participant and moderator in a three-way AI debate. You run Gemini and Codex via CLI, contribute your own analysis, and synthesize all perspectives.

You are NOT just an orchestrator. You are an active participant with your own voice.

> This skill runs by explicit command only (/debate). It will never auto-invoke.


Parsing Invocation

/debate [-r N] [-d STYLE] [-m MODE] [-w N] <question or task>

Flags:
- -r N / --rounds N - Number of rounds (1-10, default: 1)
- -d STYLE / --debate-style STYLE - quick|thorough|adversarial|collaborative
- -m MODE / --moderator-style MODE - transparent|guided|authoritative (default: guided)
- -w N / --max-words N - Word limit per response (default: 300)

Moderator styles:
- transparent - Claude presents all views neutrally, minimal editorial voice
- guided (default) - Claude highlights key disagreements and steers toward resolution
- authoritative - Claude takes strong positions and challenges weak arguments

Style defaults (when --rounds not specified): quick=1, thorough=3, adversarial=3, collaborative=2

Flag precedence: --rounds always overrides style defaults.


Orchestration

Phase 1: Setup

  1. Parse flags from user invocation
  2. Generate debate ID: NNN-topic-slug (next available number)
  3. Create folder structure:
    {cwd}/debates/ +-- index.json # Add debate ID to array +-- viewer.html # Copy from skill folder if missing +-- NNN-topic-slug/ +-- state.json # Initialize (see below) +-- context.md # Question + config +-- rounds/ # Empty folder

  4. Initialize state.json:
    json { "version": 2, "debate_id": "NNN-topic-slug", "topic": "Human readable topic", "status": "in_progress", "current_round": 0, "rounds_total": N, "moderator_style": "guided", "participants": ["gemini", "codex", "claude"], "created_at": "ISO-8601", "sessions": {}, "telemetry": { "round_durations": {}, "retries_count": 0 }, "last_error": null }

Telemetry fields:
- round_durations - Object mapping round number to seconds: {"1": 45, "2": 38}
- retries_count - Total retry attempts across all rounds
- last_error - null or {"type": "rate_limit", "message": "429 Too Many Requests", "round": 2, "advisor": "gemini", "timestamp": "ISO-8601"}

  1. Update index.json atomically - Add debate folder name to the debates array. Use update_debate_index() from helpers.md to prevent corruption during parallel debates.

Phase 2: Run Rounds

Round 1 - All three analyze independently:

# Gemini (from project root for file access)
cd "$PROJECT_ROOT" && gemini -y -o text "You are an advisor in a three-way debate.
Topic: {topic}
Task: {task}
Provide initial analysis. {max_words} words max."

# Codex (from debate folder)
cd "$DEBATE_FOLDER" && codex exec --full-auto "You are an advisor in a three-way debate.
Topic: {topic}
Task: {task}
Provide initial analysis. {max_words} words max."

After both respond:
- Save responses to rounds/r001_gemini.md and rounds/r001_codex.md
- Write YOUR analysis to rounds/r001_claude.md (adapt tone to --moderator-style)
- Capture session UUIDs and store in state.json
- Record round duration in telemetry.round_durations

Round 2+ - All three respond to each other:

# Gemini (resume session)
cd "$PROJECT_ROOT" && gemini -r <UUID> -y -o text "Round N.
Codex said: {codex_response}
Claude said: {claude_response}
Respond to both. {max_words} words max."

# Codex (resume session)
cd "$DEBATE_FOLDER" && codex exec resume <UUID> --full-auto "Round N.
Gemini said: {gemini_response}
Claude said: {claude_response}
Respond to both. {max_words} words max."

After both respond:
- Save to rounds/r00N_gemini.md, rounds/r00N_codex.md
- Write YOUR response to rounds/r00N_claude.md
- Update current_round in state.json
- Record round duration in telemetry.round_durations
- Early-stop check: If round >= 2 and all three advisors show strong convergence (same recommendation, no new arguments), set early_stop: true in state.json with early_stop_reason: "consensus" and skip remaining rounds

Phase 3: Handle Failures

On failure, read helpers.md in this skill folder for retry logic and error handling functions.

Quick reference:
- Timeout -> Retry with exponential backoff (2s, 4s, 8s)
- Rate limit -> Wait 60s, retry
- Session expired -> Create new session with full context
- Usage limit -> Skip advisor, continue with others

Always record failures in state.json:

{
  "last_error": {
    "type": "rate_limit",
    "message": "429 Too Many Requests (capped at 200 chars)",
    "round": 2,
    "advisor": "gemini",
    "timestamp": "ISO-8601"
  },
  "telemetry": { "retries_count": 3 }
}

Phase 4: Synthesis

After all rounds complete (or early-stop triggered):

  1. Create transcript.md - Combine all rounds chronologically
  2. Create synthesis.md using the structured output contract:
    ```markdown
    # Debate Synthesis: {topic}

## Advisor Summary

Advisor Position Confidence Key Assumption
Gemini ... XX% ...
Codex ... XX% ...
Claude ... XX% ...

## Consensus (All Agree)
- Point 1
- Point 2

## Disputed Issues
- Issue: [Gemini view] vs [Codex view] vs [Claude view]

## Risks & Failure Modes
| Risk | Raised by | Severity |
|------|-----------|----------|
| ... | Gemini | High |

## Recommendations
| Priority | Action | Source |
|----------|--------|--------|
| 1 | ... | All/Gemini/Codex/Claude |

## Conclusion
{Your final recommendation}

## Metadata
- Rounds completed: {N}
- Early stop: {yes/no} ({reason if yes})
- Total duration: {sum of round_durations}s
```

  1. Update state.json: Set status: "completed", add completed_at

Advisor Output Contract

Each advisor response (including yours) should follow this structure:

**Position:** {1-line summary of recommendation}

**Key Arguments:**
- Argument 1
- Argument 2

**Assumptions:**
- What I'm taking for granted

**Risks / Failure Modes:**
- What could go wrong with my approach

**What Would Change My Mind:**
- Evidence or argument that would shift my position

**Confidence:** {0-100}%

When prompting Gemini and Codex, include this structure in the prompt so their responses are comparable. Do not invent facts; if uncertain, say so explicitly.


Your Contributions

Each round, write YOUR analysis to rounds/r00N_claude.md following the output contract above.

DO NOT just summarize. PARTICIPATE.

Wrong: "Gemini said X, Codex said Y. Both make good points."

Right: "Gemini raises a valid concern about performance, but misses our existing cache. Codex's security point is critical-I agree. However, BOTH missed the rate limiting vulnerability. My recommendation: address security first (agreeing with Codex), use existing cache (disagreeing with Gemini)."

Adapt tone to --moderator-style:
- transparent - Present your position alongside others, equal weight
- guided - Highlight the strongest arguments, steer toward resolution
- authoritative - Take a firm stance, challenge weak reasoning directly


CLI Quick Reference

Gemini:
- First call: gemini -y -o text "prompt"
- Resume: gemini -r <UUID> -y -o text "prompt"
- Get UUID: gemini --list-sessions
- Always use -o text for captured output

Codex:
- First call: codex exec --full-auto "prompt"
- Resume: codex exec resume <UUID> --full-auto "prompt"
- UUID appears in output header


File Checklist

Before ending any debate, verify:

debates/
+-- index.json              PASS: Contains this debate
+-- viewer.html             PASS: Exists
+-- NNN-topic/
    +-- state.json          PASS: Has status, participants, current_round
    +-- context.md          PASS: Has question
    +-- transcript.md       PASS: (if completed)
    +-- synthesis.md        PASS: (if completed)
    +-- rounds/
        +-- r001_gemini.md  PASS:
        +-- r001_codex.md   PASS:
        +-- r001_claude.md  PASS: YOUR contribution

Helper Functions

For error handling, retry logic, and atomic state updates, read:
helpers.md in this skill folder.

This contains:
- update_debate_state() - Safe atomic state writes
- update_debate_index() - Safe atomic index.json writes (parallel-safe)
- run_advisor_with_retry() - Exponential backoff retry with telemetry
- log_contextual_error() - User-friendly error output

Cross-platform alternative: For Windows/macOS without flock, use:

node tools/atomic-json.mjs write state.json '<json>'
node tools/atomic-json.mjs append-index index.json '<entry-json>'

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
debate怎么安装?

没有现成安装命令:按安装说明或仓库 README,把 SKILL.md 放进客户端的 skills 目录(一般一个技能一个文件夹)。

debate支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

debate权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

debate收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

debate用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。