Wjs Auditing Project

SKILL运维和基础设施
运维和基础设施 未标注权限 许可证不明确

Use when the user asks to audit what's wrong with a project, "make it right", "看看项目出了什么问题", "为什么用户的需求还没上线", "为什么没提交App Store", "为什么没新build", or wants a holistic state-of-the-project check covering unmerged branches, stalled PRs, failed GitHub Actions, stale builds, plan drift (TODOS.md / ROADMAP), unreleased commits, and log errors. Runs read-only investigation, presents a grouped checklist, fixes only after explicit user confirmation. Aware of the Cathier iOS app workflow (Xcode + fastlane + auto-merge @claude PRs from in-app feedback).

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

Wjs Auditing Project是运维和基础设施类的 Agent Skill,安装方式:GitHub 仓库,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,没有现成安装命令,需按说明手动放置 SKILL.md。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类运维和基础设施 安装方式GitHub 仓库 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 claude-skills
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

GitHub 仓库
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    按安装说明或仓库 README,把 SKILL.md 放到客户端的 skills 目录(一般一个技能一个文件夹)。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

运维和基础设施
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方jianshuo仓库 claude-skills · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式GitHub 仓库安装包 jianshuo/claude-skills
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 2026-05-18
正文体量10.0 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
查服务与日志

按现象定位服务状态与日志线索。

写部署与巡检脚本

把重复的部署、巡检写成脚本。

故障排查

按步骤排查网络、依赖与配置。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 基础信息齐全,可以先按说明装一个试试。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有现成安装命令,要按安装说明或仓库 README 手动放置。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在运维和基础设施场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
Wjs Auditing Project当前 未标注权限 GitHub 仓库 未标注 未标注 无
Azure 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 664.2 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure diagnostics 问题管理 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 657.6 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure aigateway 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 655.3 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure AI 搜索 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 651.4 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure Cloud migrate 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 650.7 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有

SKILL.md 全文

10.0 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

wjs-auditing-project

Overview

Holistic project-state audit. Find everything that's stalled, broken, or diverged from the plan — then fix it together after the user confirms the checklist.

Hard two-phase split:

  1. Investigate → present grouped checklist (read-only; no commits, no merges, no pushes)
  2. Fix — only after the user explicitly confirms what to do

Never collapse the phases. The user wants to see the full picture before any action. "Just go ahead and fix everything" is fine as confirmation, but you still produce the checklist first so they can scan it.

When to use

  • "看看现在的项目到底出了什么问题" / "make it right" / "what's broken"
  • "为什么我的反馈还没上线"
  • "为什么很久没有新 build / 没提交 App Store"
  • "有没有 PR / 分支没合"
  • Returning to a project after time away
  • Before a release / TestFlight push, to make sure nothing is dangling

Phase 1 — Investigate (parallel)

Run all the read-only checks in one message with parallel Bash calls. Don't ask the user which to run; run them all. Many will return "nothing wrong" — that's fine, those just don't show up in the checklist.

A. Working tree & stashes

  • git status — uncommitted work?
  • git stash list — forgotten stashes?
  • git branch -vv — local branches, ahead/behind tracking
  • git log --oneline main..HEAD — what's on current branch not in main
  • git fetch origin --prune && git log --oneline HEAD..@{upstream} — what's on remote not local
  • git branch -r --merged main and git branch -r --no-merged main — remote branches still floating

B. Open / draft PRs

  • gh pr list --state open --json number,title,isDraft,mergeable,mergeStateStatus,updatedAt,author,headRefName
  • For any PR older than 7 days OR with mergeStateStatus ≠ CLEAN: capture the failing checks via gh pr checks <num>
  • Auto-merge bot PRs (per memory: in-app feedback → @claude PR → auto-merge): gh pr list --author "app/claude" --state all --limit 20 — any merged but not yet in a TestFlight build? Any stuck open?

C. CI / GitHub Actions

  • gh run list --limit 20 --json conclusion,name,headBranch,createdAt,databaseId,event
  • gh run list --status failure --limit 10 — failures specifically
  • For each failure on main or on an open PR's branch: gh run view <id> --log-failed | tail -100 to capture the actual error

D. Released vs unreleased work (iOS specifics for Cathier)

  • grep -E "MARKETING_VERSION|CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION" *.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj | sort -u — current version + build number
  • git tag --sort=-creatordate | head -5 — recent release tags
  • git log --oneline <last-tag>..main — commits since last tagged release
  • Check fastlane/ config and fastlane/report.xml (if present) for last pilot / deliver invocation
  • git log -1 --format="%ai %s" -- fastlane/ — last fastlane change
  • git log --all --grep="bump\|version\|build" -10 --oneline — recent version bumps

E. Plan drift

  • Read TODOS.md, CHANGELOG.md, APP_STORE_SUBMISSION_GUIDE.md, ROADMAP.md, docs/plan*.md if any exist
  • Cross-reference plan items against shipped commits — what's listed but not done? What has a date that's already passed?
  • grep -rn "TODO\|FIXME\|XXX" --include="*.swift" . — drift markers in source

F. App / system logs

  • ls -t ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/Cathier* 2>/dev/null | head -5 — recent crash reports for the app
  • log show --predicate 'process == "Cathier"' --last 1d --style compact 2>/dev/null | grep -iE "error|fault" | head -20 — recent runtime errors (skip silently if no install on this Mac)
  • ls -t ~/Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/*/Logs/Build/*.xcactivitylog 2>/dev/null | head -3 — last build attempts (existence + mtime; don't try to parse)

G. User-feedback specifically

Per memory: in-app feedback creates @claude PRs that auto-merge into main. To answer "why isn't my feedback in the app":
1. Was a PR created from feedback? (gh pr list --author "app/claude" --state all)
2. Was it merged? (check PR status)
3. Is there a TestFlight/App Store build newer than the merge commit?
If 3 = no, that's the answer: merged into main but never built/submitted.

Presenting the checklist

Output one grouped markdown checklist. Each item must contain: what's wrong, evidence (numbers/dates/file paths), and a proposed action phrased so the user can say yes/no. Group by urgency:

## What I found

### 🔴 Blocking (these gate everything else)
- [ ] PR #42 "Add jokes redesign": 3 failing checks (SwiftLint, build, tests). Last commit 2026-04-30. → Read logs, fix, push?
- [ ] main is 7 commits ahead of last tag v1.4.0 (2026-03-22). No TestFlight build since then. → Tag v1.5.0 and prep release notes?

### 🟡 Open work
- [ ] Local branch `home-simplification` has 5 commits, no open PR, last activity 2026-05-08. → Open PR against main?
- [ ] Stash "WIP: brain trainer stats" from 2026-04-02. → Show diff and decide drop/apply?

### 🟢 Plan drift (TODOS.md / fastlane)
- [ ] TODOS.md line 14: "Submit App Store build by 2026-04-30" — overdue 11d, no `fastlane pilot` invocation since 2026-03-12.
- [ ] TODOS.md line 22: "Hook up haptics on streak page" — no matching commit on main.
- [ ] 2 auto-merged @claude PRs (#88, #91) from in-app feedback merged after last TestFlight build — user feedback shipped to main but not to TestFlight.

### Logs / errors
- [ ] 23 errors in last 24h matching "NSURLErrorDomain -1009" (offline path) — investigate or note as expected?
- [ ] 1 crash report from 2026-05-10 in DiagnosticReports — pull stack and triage?

### Looks fine
- Working tree clean, no orphan branches on origin, no failed CI on main this week.

End with: "想让我把这些都修好吗?还是挑一部分?或者先讨论某一项?"

Phase 2 — Fix (only after user confirms)

Once the user confirms (full set, subset, or "all green and yellow but not the App Store one"):

  1. TaskCreate a todo per confirmed item
  2. Order: failing CI → branch merges → tags → version bumps → release notes → build prompt
  3. Work them one at a time; mark done immediately, not in batches
  4. After each fix, re-run the corresponding check from phase 1 to verify it's actually resolved
  5. End with a short summary: fixed / skipped / requires-human

What you can do autonomously

  • Read failing CI logs, edit code, push the fix
  • Open a PR with gh pr create for an unpushed branch
  • Re-trigger a failed run with gh run rerun <id> after diagnosing why it failed (don't blindly rerun flaky-looking failures — find the root cause first)
  • Merge a clean PR (gh pr merge --squash --auto) if the user said yes for that specific PR
  • Bump MARKETING_VERSION / CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION in project.pbxproj
  • Add a CHANGELOG entry, tag the release with git tag (don't push tag until user confirms)
  • Drop or pop a stash after showing the diff

What requires the user to act

Print the exact command they should run with a leading !:
- ! fastlane pilot upload — App Store / TestFlight submission signs the binary; needs them
- ! open Cathier.xcodeproj — anything that needs Xcode archive UI
- Anything destructive: git reset --hard, git push --force, deleting branches

Common findings → standard fixes

Finding Standard fix
Local branch ahead of main, no PR Rebase on main, push, gh pr create
PR failing CI on same step twice Read failed log, fix root cause, don't blindly rerun
Unreleased commits + stale TestFlight Bump build number, tag, write release notes, prompt user to run fastlane pilot
Stash >30 days, unclear context Show git stash show -p <n> to user, ask drop/apply
TODOS.md item with no commit Surface to user — descoped or forgotten? Don't assume
Auto-merged feedback PRs newer than last build The fix is a new TestFlight build, not more code changes
fastlane/ untouched but plan says App Store deadline passed Surface the deadline + last submission date; user decides priority

Red flags — STOP

Thought Reality
"I'll just fix it and skip the checklist" No. The user asked specifically for the audit-then-confirm flow.
"The PR looks safe to merge, I'll do it" Only if they confirmed this PR by name in their reply.
"I'll force-push to clean up history" Never without explicit per-action confirmation.
"Let me close that stuck PR to tidy up" Investigate first; the work may be salvageable.
"I'll submit to App Store on their behalf" Never. Print the ! fastlane … command and stop.
"The crash report is probably nothing" Pull the stack and surface it. Let the user decide.
"Plan item is old, must be obsolete" Ask. Don't delete plan entries.

Notes specific to this user / Cathier

  • Default working dir: /Users/jianshuo/code/Cathier. Honor wherever invoked.
  • Cathier is a SwiftUI iOS app with fastlane/ for App Store / TestFlight.
  • Plan source of truth lives in TODOS.md and APP_STORE_SUBMISSION_GUIDE.md. Read both.
  • Memory note: in-app feedback → app/claude opens a PR → auto-merge to main. So "why isn't my feedback in the app" usually means the merge happened but no new build was cut. Check TestFlight build date vs PR merge date before investigating the code.
  • gh is authenticated. fastlane is installed (Gemfile present).
  • DESIGN.md is the visual source of truth; never propose UI fixes that conflict with it without flagging.

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
Wjs Auditing Project怎么安装?

没有现成安装命令:按安装说明或仓库 README,把 SKILL.md 放进客户端的 skills 目录(一般一个技能一个文件夹)。

Wjs Auditing Project支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

Wjs Auditing Project权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

Wjs Auditing Project收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

Wjs Auditing Project用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。