Autograph

SKILL开发
开发 未标注权限 许可证不明确

Schema-as-code enforcement for any Obsidian vault. Zero hardcoded domains. Use when creating vault cards, checking vault health, running schema compliance, deduplicating entities, generating MOC indexes, running decay cycles, bootstrapping a vault, fixing wikilinks, finding orphans or backlinks, extracting entities from daily files, or touching/promoting cards. Do NOT use for content generation or non-vault file operations.

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

Autograph是开发类的 Agent Skill,安装方式:GitHub 仓库,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,没有现成安装命令,需按说明手动放置 SKILL.md。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类开发 安装方式GitHub 仓库 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 agent-second-brain
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

GitHub 仓库
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    按安装说明或仓库 README,把 SKILL.md 放到客户端的 skills 目录(一般一个技能一个文件夹)。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

开发
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方smixs仓库 agent-second-brain · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式GitHub 仓库安装包 smixs/agent-second-brain
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 2026-06-12
正文体量14.5 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
写代码与改 bug

按需求补代码、定位并修掉报错。

读仓库与生成改动

让模型读懂项目结构,再给出可落地的改动。

跑测试与排查故障

按现象排查问题,补测试用例并复跑。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 基础信息齐全,可以先按说明装一个试试。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有现成安装命令,要按安装说明或仓库 README 手动放置。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在开发场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
Autograph当前 未标注权限 GitHub 仓库 未标注 未标注 无
技能审查员 浏览器控制 ClawHub 市场 877.9 万 OpenClaw 有
Vercel React 最佳实践 浏览器控制 GitHub 仓库 849.1 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
GitHub 代码协作 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 763.3 万 OpenClaw 有
网页设计指南 联网访问 GitHub 仓库 668.6 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
本体论 只读 ClawHub 市场 663.7 万 OpenClaw 有

SKILL.md 全文

14.5 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

autograph — typed vault engine

One schema. One graph. Works on any vault.

Overview

No hardcoded domains, types, or paths. The agent discovers structure from data, builds a schema, then enforces it. All scripts share common.py. Zero external dependencies (stdlib only, API calls via urllib).

Quick Reference: 5 Workflows

Workflow When to use Entry point
BOOTSTRAP New vault / after import / first setup discover.py → enforce.py → graph.py health
HEALTH Daily maintenance / on request graph.py health → fix → moc → decay
CREATE New knowledge card Schema lookup → write file → link → touch
SEARCH & LINK Find info + strengthen connections Hub → links → target; graph.py orphans → connect
ORCHESTRATE Automated multi-agent workflows (no API keys) orchestrate.py health\|bootstrap

Workflow 1: BOOTSTRAP (raw vault → structured graph)

When to use: New vault, bulk import, first setup. Run once, then switch to HEALTH.

Full guide: references/bootstrap-workflow.md

Summary (10 phases)

  1. Discover: uv run scripts/discover.py <vault-dir> --verbose > /tmp/discovery.json
  2. Generate schema: Script baseline (generate_schema.py) + agent swarm (swarm_prepare.py → Wave 1 haiku → swarm_reduce.py → Wave 2 sonnet). NEVER skip the swarm.
  3. Review: Human approves schema. Never auto-apply.
  4. Bootstrap + Enforce: engine.py init + enforce.py --apply
  5. Link cleanup: link_cleanup.py --apply (before enrichment)
  6. Tag enrich: enrich.py tags --apply (via OpenRouter API)
  7. Deduplicate: dedup.py --apply (before link enrichment)
  8. Link enrich: enrich.py swarm-links --apply (always swarm-links, never links)
  9. MOC generation: moc.py generate
  10. Verify: graph.py health + enforce.py → target 90+/100

Critical Rules

  • Always run Phase 2B (agent swarm). Script alone cannot classify unstructured content.
  • Always use swarm-links, not links (0.3% vs 81.6% match rate).
  • Always dry-run first — run without --apply before applying.
  • Dedup before link enrich — prevents links to merged/trashed files.

Workflow 2: HEALTH (daily graph maintenance)

When to use: Daily upkeep, after edits, or when health score drops. This is the most common workflow.

Decision Logic

1. Run `graph.py health <vault-dir>` → check score
2. If health < 90 → investigate:
   a. broken_links > 0  → `graph.py fix <vault-dir> --apply`
   b. orphans > 5       → connect orphans to hub files (see Workflow 4)
   c. desc_coverage < 70% → add descriptions to files missing them
3. Run `moc.py generate <vault-dir>` → regenerate indexes
4. Run `engine.py decay <vault-dir>` → recalculate relevance + tiers
5. Run `graph.py health <vault-dir>` → confirm improvement

Thresholds & Action Triggers

Metric Good Action needed
Health score ≥90 <90: investigate broken links, orphans
Broken links 0 >0: graph.py fix --apply
Orphan files <5 ≥5: connect to hubs (Workflow 4)
Description coverage ≥80% <70%: add descriptions
Stale cards (>90d) <20% >30%: engine.py creative to resurface

Commands

uv run scripts/graph.py health &lt;vault-dir&gt;           # health check
uv run scripts/graph.py fix &lt;vault-dir&gt; --apply       # fix broken links
uv run scripts/moc.py generate &lt;vault-dir&gt;            # regenerate MOCs
uv run scripts/engine.py decay &lt;vault-dir&gt;            # decay cycle (Ebbinghaus)
uv run scripts/engine.py decay &lt;vault-dir&gt; --dry-run  # preview decay changes
uv run scripts/engine.py stats &lt;vault-dir&gt;            # tier distribution
uv run scripts/engine.py creative 5 &lt;vault-dir&gt;       # resurface forgotten cards

Workflow 3: CREATE (new card with immediate linking)

When to use: Creating any new vault card. Always link immediately — orphan cards are wasted knowledge.

Steps

  1. Type: Pick from schema node_types
  2. Path: Reverse-lookup domain_inference to find target folder:
    python # domain_inference maps path→domain. To find folder for domain &quot;crm&quot;: for path_prefix, domain in schema[&#x27;domain_inference&#x27;].items(): if domain == &#x27;crm&#x27;: target_folder = path_prefix # e.g. &quot;work/crm/&quot; break
  3. Frontmatter: Write description (search snippet, not title repeat), tags (2-5, lowercase, kebab-case), status from type's enum
  4. LINKING PROTOCOL (mandatory):
    a. Add ## Related section with [[hub]] file of the domain
    • Hub = _index.md or MEMORY.md of that domain
      b. Find 2-3 sibling cards of same type+domain → add [[links]]
    • uv run scripts/graph.py backlinks &lt;vault&gt; &lt;hub&gt; → find siblings
    • Or: read vault-graph.json → filter nodes by type+domain
      c. Run uv run scripts/engine.py touch &lt;new-file&gt;
  5. Verify checklist:
    - [ ] Hub linked?
    - [ ] 2+ related cards found?
    - [ ] description ≠ title repeat?
    - [ ] tags: 2-5, lowercase, kebab-case?
    - [ ] status ∈ schema enum?

Templates: references/card-templates.md


Workflow 4: SEARCH & LINK (find + strengthen connections)

When to use: Looking up information in the vault, or strengthening weak areas of the graph.

Navigation (Hub → Links → Target)

  1. Determine domain from the topic (work, personal, research, etc. — whatever your schema defines)
  2. Start at hub: _index.md or MEMORY.md of that domain
  3. Follow links — max 2 hops from hub to target
  4. Fallback: uv run scripts/graph.py backlinks &lt;vault&gt; &lt;target&gt; for reverse links

Orphan Rescue

uv run scripts/graph.py orphans &lt;vault-dir&gt;        # find orphans
# For each orphan: connect to nearest hub or sibling card

Link Strengthening

# Files with &lt;2 links → enrich
OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-... uv run scripts/enrich.py swarm-links &lt;vault-dir&gt; --apply
uv run scripts/graph.py health &lt;vault-dir&gt;          # verify improvement

Workflow 5: ORCHESTRATE (automated multi-agent workflows)

When to use: Instead of running scripts manually. No API keys — the Claude Code agent does all judgment directly.

Phase 0: Script sequencing

python3 scripts/orchestrate.py health &lt;vault-dir&gt;      # automated health workflow
python3 scripts/orchestrate.py bootstrap &lt;vault-dir&gt;    # full bootstrap (one command)

health runs: graph check > fix broken links > link cleanup > MOC > decay > verify.
bootstrap runs: enforce > cleanup > tags > dedup > swarm-links > MOC > verify.

Phases 1-3: Agent judgment (no API keys)

The agent (you) does the judgment directly — read prepared data, decide, write results.

# Phase 1: prep dedup clusters for YOUR review
python3 scripts/orchestrate.py dedup-prepare &lt;vault-dir&gt;
# -&gt; writes .graph/dedup-review-input.json
# -&gt; YOU read clusters, mark approved=true, then: dedup.py --apply-manifest

# Phase 2: prep domain catalogs for YOUR link suggestions
python3 scripts/orchestrate.py link-prepare &lt;vault-dir&gt;
# -&gt; writes .graph/link-review-input.json
# -&gt; YOU read catalogs, suggest links per domain, write batch results

# Phase 3: prep graph data for YOUR semantic analysis
python3 scripts/orchestrate.py graph-prepare &lt;vault-dir&gt;
# -&gt; writes .graph/graph-analysis-input.json
# -&gt; YOU analyze contradictions, missing links, stale hubs, write findings

For Phases 1-3: run the prep command, read the output JSON, do the analysis yourself (you ARE the LLM), write results back. Use Agent tool for parallel domain work in Phase 2.



Decay Engine (Ebbinghaus)

The decay system models memory with three key mechanisms:

1. Access count (spacing effect)

Each touch increments access_count in frontmatter. More retrievals = slower forgetting:

strength = 1 + ln(access_count)
effective_rate = base_rate / strength
relevance = max(floor, 1.0 - effective_rate * days_since_access)

Example: a card touched 5 times has strength = 1 + ln(5) ≈ 2.6, decaying ~2.6x slower than a card touched once.

2. Domain-specific rates

Different content types decay at different rates. Configure in schema decay.domain_rates:

Type Rate Half-life (~) Rationale
contact 0.005 100 days People don't become irrelevant quickly
crm 0.008 62 days Deals have medium lifecycle
learning 0.010 50 days Knowledge fades moderately
project 0.012 42 days Projects have defined timelines
daily 0.020 25 days Daily notes lose relevance fast
(default) 0.015 33 days Fallback for unlisted types

3. Graduated recall

Touch promotes one tier at a time, not a direct jump to active:

archive → cold → warm → active

Each promotion sets last_accessed to a midpoint date, so without re-touch the card naturally drifts back.

Backward compatibility

  • Files without access_count → default=1 → 1+ln(1)=1.0 → rate unchanged
  • Files without type → default rate applies
  • Existing calls calc_relevance(days, schema) → work unchanged (new params optional)

Maintenance Commands

uv run scripts/moc.py generate &lt;vault-dir&gt;                                       # MOC generation
uv run scripts/engine.py decay &lt;vault-dir&gt;                                       # decay cycle
uv run scripts/engine.py touch &lt;vault-dir&gt;/path/card.md                          # touch (graduated)
uv run scripts/engine.py creative 5 &lt;vault-dir&gt;                                  # creative recall
uv run scripts/engine.py stats &lt;vault-dir&gt;                                       # stats
uv run scripts/graph.py backlinks &lt;vault-dir&gt; path/to/card                       # backlinks
uv run scripts/graph.py orphans &lt;vault-dir&gt;                                      # orphans
uv run scripts/graph.py fix &lt;vault-dir&gt; --apply                                  # fix links
uv run scripts/daily.py extract &lt;memory-dir&gt; &lt;vault-dir&gt;                         # entity extraction
uv run scripts/engine.py init &lt;vault-dir&gt; --dry-run                              # bootstrap bare files
OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-... uv run scripts/enrich.py swarm-links &lt;vault-dir&gt; --apply  # link enrichment
OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-... uv run scripts/enrich.py tags &lt;vault-dir&gt; --apply         # tag enrichment
uv run scripts/link_cleanup.py &lt;vault-dir&gt; --apply                               # link cleanup

Scripts

Script Purpose
common.py Shared: parse FM, walk, domain, decay (Ebbinghaus), wikilinks
discover.py Workflow 1: scan vault, output enum candidates
generate_schema.py Workflow 1: turn discovery JSON into draft schema
swarm_prepare.py Workflow 1: bin-pack vault into agent batches
swarm_reduce.py Workflow 1: consolidate + validate schema
enforce.py Workflow 1: validate + autofix against schema
link_cleanup.py Workflow 1/4: remove phantom wikilinks from ## Related
enrich.py Workflow 1/4: tags + swarm-links (catalog-oriented link enrichment)
dedup.py Workflow 1: safe merge + .trash/
graph.py Workflow 2/4: health score, link repair, backlinks, orphans
moc.py Workflow 2: MOC generation per domain
orchestrate.py Workflow 5: multi-agent orchestration (health, bootstrap, dedup-review, link-enrich, graph-analyze)
engine.py Workflow 2/3: decay (Ebbinghaus), touch (graduated), creative, stats, init
daily.py Entity extraction from memory files
test_autograph.py Self-contained tests (~193 cases, temp fixtures)

Files

File In package? Purpose
schema.example.json Yes Template — copy and customize (includes domain_rates)
schema.json No Your vault's schema (generated)
schema.local.json No Local override (gitignored)
references/ Yes Bootstrap workflow, schema docs, card templates, linking protocol

Common Mistakes

Mistake Fix
Skipping agent swarm in Phase 2 CRITICAL: always run Step 2B. Script alone cannot classify unstructured content. No exceptions.
Using deprecated links subcommand links was removed (0.3% match rate). Only swarm-links is available — 81.6% match rate.
Creating cards without linking Always follow Workflow 3 — link to hub + 2 siblings immediately. Orphan cards are wasted knowledge.
Touching archive cards to active directly Use graduated recall — touch promotes one tier at a time (archive→cold→warm→active).
Sending full vault to one agent Use swarm_prepare.py — bin-packs into ~50K token batches.
Running Wave 2 without Wave 1 swarm_reduce.py prepare needs JSONL in .graph/swarm/classifications/.
Using schema.example.json directly Run discover → generate your own schema.json
Description = title repeat Write specific search snippet
Status not in enum Check schema's node_types
Skip dry run Always run without --apply first
Running link enrich before dedup Creates links to files that get merged/trashed. Dedup first.
Missing OPENROUTER_API_KEY enrich.py reads from OPENROUTER_API_KEY env var.
Only running swarm-links once Run again with --force to enrich ALL files.

Default Models

Command Default model Override
tags google/gemini-3-flash-preview --model flag
swarm-links google/gemini-2.0-flash-001 --model flag

Both are production-tested. Do not change defaults without benchmarking.

Troubleshooting

Error: Schema not found → Create schema.json from discover output, or pass path: enforce.py vault/ my-schema.json

Score drops after enforce → New files without frontmatter. Run engine.py init vault/

Dedup picks wrong canonical → Content richness wins. Enrich the right file first, re-run.

Low match rate on swarm-links (<60%) → Check if LLM returns paths instead of stems. Try --force for second pass.

swarm-links shows 0 matched for some batches → Usually network errors. Results are cached — rerun and only failed batches retry.

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
Autograph怎么安装?

没有现成安装命令:按安装说明或仓库 README,把 SKILL.md 放进客户端的 skills 目录(一般一个技能一个文件夹)。

Autograph支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

Autograph权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

Autograph收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

Autograph用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。