真人写真文章 (Human-Style Article Writing)

Overview

Write articles that read naturally like human-authored content. This skill uses a structured three-step workflow: initial drafting with Hy3, cross-model peer review, and an interactive segment-by-segment review loop with the user.

Workflow

Step 1: Draft Article with Hy3 Model

When the user provides a topic and requirements:

1. Ask the user for the following details if not already provided:
   - Article topic / theme
   - Target length (word count or approximate paragraphs)
   - Style preference (e.g., casual, narrative, academic, professional)
   - Target audience
   - Any specific points or angles the user wants covered

2. Use the hy3 model (default) to draft the full article.

3. Apply human-like writing guidelines from references/writing_guidelines.md during drafting:
   - Use natural, conversational tone appropriate to the topic
   - Include personal anecdotes or relatable scenarios where relevant
   - Vary sentence structure and length — mix short punchy sentences with longer flowing ones
   - Avoid robotic transitions and overly formal boilerplate language
   - Include occasional thoughtful digressions or nuanced observations
   - Write with a clear, authentic voice — as if a knowledgeable friend is sharing thoughts

4. Present the complete draft to the user.

Step 2: Cross-Model Peer Review

After the initial draft is complete:

1. Randomly select one model from available models (excluding hy3) to act as a reviewer.

2. Instruct the selected reviewer model to evaluate the draft against these criteria:
   - Does the article read naturally, like a real person wrote it?
   - Are there any phrases, transitions, or patterns that feel AI-generated?
   - Is the tone consistent and appropriate for the subject matter?
   - Are there any logical gaps, contradictions, or awkward passages?
   - Does the overall flow feel organic rather than formulaic?

3. Revise the article based on the review feedback. Apply suggested improvements to enhance human-like quality.

4. Present the revised article to the user, along with a brief summary of:
   - Which model was used for review
   - Key findings from the review
   - Changes made

Step 3: Segment-by-Segment Interactive Review

After the cross-model review and revision:

1. Split the article into logical segments. Each segment should be:
   - Typically 2-4 paragraphs
   - A self-contained thematic unit
   - Short enough for focused review, long enough to have meaningful content

2. Present segments one at a time. For each segment, ask the user:
   > "这段内容是否符合你的要求？" (Does this segment meet your requirements?)

3. For each segment, handle the user's response:
   - User approves: Mark the segment as accepted. Proceed to the next segment.
   - User requests changes or rejects: Rewrite only that specific segment based on the user's feedback. Use the hy3 model for rewriting. Present the rewritten version and ask for confirmation again. Repeat until the user approves.

4. After all segments are approved, present the final complete article to the user.

Important Rules

• Default model: Always use the hy3 model for drafting and rewriting articles.
• Review model: For Step 2, randomly select a model other than hy3 to ensure diverse perspectives. Do NOT reuse the same review model across sessions unless the user specifically requests it.
• Skipping steps: If the user explicitly requests to skip the cross-model review, proceed directly to segment-by-segment review.
• Short articles: If the article is under 300 words, the segment-by-segment review may use 2-3 larger segments instead.
• Progress reporting: Keep the user informed of the current step and progress throughout the workflow.
• User controls the pace: The segment-by-segment review continues at the user's pace — do not rush through segments without user confirmation.