出海助手-用户研究

SKILL研究检索
研究检索 未标注权限 许可证不明确
安装这个技能

开展用户研究:访谈、问卷、画像与痛点,支撑出海产品决策。 / Expert guidance for user research, helping product teams conduct interviews, create personas, design surveys, run usability tests, and synthesize findings into actionable insights. Applies both qualitative methods (interviews, contextual inquiry) and quantitative methods (surveys, analytics) to build deep understanding of user needs, behaviors, and motivations.

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

出海助手-用户研究是研究检索类的 Agent Skill,安装方式未标注,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,有可直接复制的安装命令。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类研究检索 安装方式未标注 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 未标注
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

未标注
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
skillhub install user_9c953624/yimubiao-user-research
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    执行上面的命令安装;也可以把仓库里的 SKILL.md 手动放进客户端的 skills 目录。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

研究检索
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方user_9c953624仓库 未标注 · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式未标注安装包 community
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 1791681867
正文体量11.0 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
查资料并整理出处

让模型按主题查资料,并把引用来源整理成清单。

网页与文献要点提炼

把长文、论文、网页压成能直接看的要点。

竞品与行业汇总

按关键词汇总竞品动态与行业信息。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 有可直接复制的安装命令,不用自己翻文档找入口。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在研究检索场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
出海助手-用户研究当前 未标注权限 未标注 未标注 未标注 有
寻找技能 浏览器控制 GitHub 仓库 3120.0 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
自我改进 Agent 接触敏感数据 ClawHub 市场 1646.4 万 OpenClaw 有
灵魂追踪 联网访问 GitHub 仓库 758.9 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
自我完善 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 682.9 万 OpenClaw 有
微软代工厂 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 661.4 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有

SKILL.md 全文

11.0 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

出海助手-用户研究 / User Research — Understanding Users Through Evidence

> 本技能改造自开源技能 user-research(来源:TerminalSkills/skills,TerminalSkills 开源技能库)。已完整保留原始运行文件(scripts/references/assets 与 LICENSE),并新增中文出海使用说明。原始英文说明见文末「English (Original)」与同目录 SKILL.original.md。

功能说明 / Functional Overview

开展用户研究:访谈、问卷、画像与痛点,支撑出海产品决策。

适用场景 / Use Cases

  • 海外用户访谈设计
  • 用户画像构建
  • 需求与痛点梳理

使用方法 / How to Use

  1. 说明研究目标,技能给出方法、提纲与分析方法。

示例 / Examples

  • 「海外用户访谈设计」——用自然语言把任务交给本技能即可。

限制说明 / Limitations

  • 需要外部服务/凭证的技能,请先完成授权配置后使用。
  • 本技能为开源技能的中文本地化版本,核心逻辑与原技能一致;如遇专业术语,正文保留英文原词(如 Shopify、SEO、GA4 等)。

English (Original) / 英文原文(完整保留)

> The section below is the original skill definition, preserved verbatim for traceability and full functionality.

User Research — Understanding Users Through Evidence

Overview

User research, helping product teams conduct interviews, create personas, design surveys, run usability tests, and synthesize findings into actionable insights. This skill applies both qualitative methods (interviews, contextual inquiry) and quantitative methods (surveys, analytics) to build deep understanding of user needs, behaviors, and motivations.

Instructions

User Interviews

## Conduct User Interviews

### Interview Types
- **Exploratory**: Discover problems and needs (early stage, open-ended)
- **Evaluative**: Test a solution or prototype (have something to show)
- **Contextual**: Watch users in their environment (richest data)

### Interview Guide

**Warm-up (3 min)**
"Tell me about your role. What does a typical day look like?"
Goal: Build rapport, understand context.

**Current behavior (10 min)**
"Walk me through the last time you [did the relevant activity]."
"What tools did you use? What was the sequence?"
"What was the most frustrating part?"
"How long did it take?"

Follow-up probes:
- "Why did you choose to do it that way?"
- "What happened next?"
- "Can you show me?" (contextual interviews)

**Pain points (10 min)**
"What's the biggest challenge you face with [topic]?"
"Have you tried any workarounds?"
"What did you try that didn't work?"
"If this took 10x longer than it should, which part is the bottleneck?"

**Desired outcomes (5 min)**
"What would 'great' look like for you?"
"If you could change one thing, what would it be?"
"How would you know if this problem was solved?"

**Closing (2 min)**
"Is there anything I should have asked but didn't?"
"Who else should I talk to about this?"
"Would you be open to testing something we're building?"

### Interview Rules
1. **No leading questions**: ❌ "Don't you think X would be better?"
2. **Past behavior > future intent**: ❌ "Would you use..." ✅ "When was the last time you..."
3. **Silence is data**: Don't fill pauses — let them think
4. **Record with permission**: Take notes AND record (you'll miss things in real-time)
5. **5 interviews = 80% of insights**: Diminishing returns after 5-8 per segment

Personas

## Create Research-Based Personas

Personas are fictional characters based on REAL research data.
Not: your imagined ideal user. Based on: interview patterns.

### Persona Template

**Name**: "Operational Olga"
**Role**: Operations Manager at a 30-person agency
**Demographics**: 32, 5 years in ops, manages 3 teams

**Goals**:
- Reduce time spent on manual reporting (currently 6 hrs/week)
- Ensure nothing falls through the cracks during client handoffs
- Have visibility into team workload without asking for status updates

**Frustrations**:
- "I spend Monday mornings rebuilding the same spreadsheet every week"
- "I only find out about blockers in the Thursday standup — too late"
- "Our tools don't talk to each other — Asana, Slack, Google Sheets, email"

**Current tools**: Asana (project management), Google Sheets (reporting), Slack
**Tech comfort**: Comfortable with SaaS tools, not technical enough for APIs
**Decision process**: Evaluates tools herself, gets budget approval from COO

**Key quote** (from interview):
"I don't need another tool. I need the tools I have to actually work together."

**Behavioral patterns** (from data):
- Logs in 3x/day, mostly on mobile during commute
- Exports data to spreadsheets weekly
- Primary workflow: check status → identify blockers → reassign work

### Rules for Good Personas
- Based on interviews (minimum 5), not assumptions
- Include behavioral patterns, not just demographics
- Update quarterly as you learn more
- Maximum 3-4 personas — more means you haven't segmented enough
- Include anti-personas (who you're NOT building for)

Surveys

## Design Effective Surveys

### When to Survey (vs Interview)
- **Survey**: Validate at scale what you discovered in interviews
- **Interview**: Discover new insights you didn't know to ask about

Sequence: Interviews first → Survey to quantify → Interviews to deepen

### Survey Design Rules

1. **Under 5 minutes**: Response rates drop 50% after 5 minutes
2. **One topic per survey**: Don't combine satisfaction + feature requests + NPS
3. **Specific questions**: ❌ "How satisfied are you?" ✅ "How easy was it to complete [specific task]?"
4. **Avoid double-barreled**: ❌ "How fast and reliable is the product?" (those are two questions)
5. **Randomize options**: Prevent order bias on multiple choice
6. **Include "Other"**: Your options never cover everything

### Question Types by Goal

**Satisfaction**: "How would you rate your experience with [feature]?" (1-7 scale)
**Effort**: "How easy was it to [task]?" (CES — Customer Effort Score, 1-7)
**Loyalty**: "How likely are you to recommend to a colleague?" (NPS, 0-10)
**Priority**: "Rank these features by importance to your workflow" (forced ranking)
**Open-ended**: "What's the one thing you'd change?" (limit to 1-2 open questions)

### Sample Sizes
- Directional insight: 30-50 responses
- Statistically significant: 200+ responses
- Segment comparison: 100+ per segment

Usability Testing

## Run Usability Tests

### Setup
- **Participants**: 5 per round (catches ~85% of issues)
- **Tasks**: 3-5 realistic scenarios
- **Method**: Think-aloud protocol ("narrate your thoughts as you go")
- **Recording**: Screen + face (tools: Lookback, UserTesting, Maze)

### Task Design
Write tasks as goals, not instructions:

❌ "Click the Settings icon, then go to Billing, then click Upgrade"
(This tests whether they can follow instructions, not whether the UI is usable)

✅ "You want to upgrade your account to the Pro plan. Please do that now."
(This tests whether they can figure out the path)

### What to Measure
- **Task completion rate**: % who finish without help
- **Time on task**: How long to complete (benchmark against target)
- **Errors**: Wrong clicks, backtracking, confusion points
- **Severity**: Is the issue a blocker (can't proceed) or an annoyance?
- **Satisfaction**: Post-task rating ("How easy was that?" 1-7)

### Severity Scale
- **Critical**: User cannot complete the task at all
- **Major**: User completes but with significant difficulty or errors
- **Minor**: User notices but works around it easily
- **Cosmetic**: User doesn't notice but it violates best practices

### After Testing
1. List all issues found, sorted by severity
2. For each issue: what happened, why, and recommended fix
3. Fix critical/major issues before launch
4. Test again after fixes (verification round)

Examples

Example 1: Creating a user interviews for a new product

User request:

We're launching a project management tool for remote design teams. Help me create a user interviews.

The agent applies the User Research framework, asking clarifying questions about target audience, market positioning, and business model. It produces a structured deliverable with specific, actionable recommendations tailored to the design-tools market, including competitive positioning and key metrics to track.

Example 2: Synthesizing interview findings into personas

User request:

I've done 12 user interviews for our project management tool. Help me synthesize the findings into actionable personas.

The agent analyzes the existing work against user research best practices, identifies missing elements, weak assumptions, and areas that need validation. It provides specific suggestions with reasoning, not generic advice, referencing the frameworks and patterns from the instructions above.

Guidelines

  1. Research before building — Talk to users before writing a single line of code; every week spent on research saves a month of building the wrong thing
  2. 5 interviews = 80% of insights — You don't need 50 interviews; 5 per segment reveals the major patterns
  3. Behavior over opinions — Ask about what people DID, not what they WOULD do; past behavior predicts future behavior
  4. Personas from data — Base personas on interview patterns, not marketing assumptions; update them as you learn
  5. Survey to quantify, not discover — Use surveys to measure how many people have a problem you discovered in interviews
  6. Think-aloud usability tests — 5 users talking through tasks reveals more than 500 survey responses about "satisfaction"
  7. Synthesize within 24 hours — Interview insights fade fast; extract key quotes, opportunities, and patterns the same day
  8. Share findings widely — Research is wasted if it stays in a document; present findings to engineering, design, and leadership

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
出海助手-用户研究怎么安装?

在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行:skillhub install user_9c953624/yimubiao-user-research。安装方式为未标注。装完刷新技能列表或重开客户端。

出海助手-用户研究支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

出海助手-用户研究权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

出海助手-用户研究收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

出海助手-用户研究用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。