Patent Draft Review (Section 112 Only)
Review a patent draft for Section 112 issues — written description, enablement, indefiniteness, antecedent basis, and means-plus-function problems — providing paste-ready claim amendments and specification additions.
Instructions
- Read the instruction file at
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/prompt.md - Ask the user for the required inputs if not already provided via
$ARGUMENTS:
- Patent specification (detailed description)
- Patent claims - Fill in the
{{PLACEHOLDER}}values with the user's content - Execute the prompt to perform the review
- Present the output to the user
Inputs
| Placeholder | What to put here |
|---|---|
{{PATENT_DRAFT}} |
The full patent draft including both the specification (title, background, summary, detailed description, figures) and the claims section |
Attribution
Adapted from arcprime-ip/patent-prompts (MIT License) by ArcPrime — <https://github.com/arcprime-ip/patent-prompts>.
Original prompt text is reproduced with the license notice retained. Modifications: repackaged into a
standalone skill with references/prompt.md, bilingual description, and SkillHub metadata.
> This skill produces an analytical aid, not legal advice. Always have a qualified patent
> professional review any output before relying on it.
Scope
Written for US patent practice — USPTO filing and prosecution, 35 U.S.C. §§ 101/102/103/112,
Alice/Mayo eligibility, Graham/KSR obviousness. For CNIPA or EPO practice, the statutory
frameworks differ and the analysis must be adapted.
