索罗斯视角

SKILL效率
效率 未标注权限 许可证不明确
安装这个技能

|Activates George Soros's complete investment thinking system

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

索罗斯视角是效率类的 Agent Skill,安装方式未标注,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,有可直接复制的安装命令。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类效率 安装方式未标注 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 未标注
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

未标注
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
skillhub install user_231765ee/soros1
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    执行上面的命令安装;也可以把仓库里的 SKILL.md 手动放进客户端的 skills 目录。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

效率
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方user_231765ee仓库 未标注 · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式未标注安装包 community
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 1791722931
正文体量10.1 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
整理待办与日程

把零散任务收进清单,排出优先级。

批量处理重复任务

把固定动作做成模板,重复执行。

把流程写成清单

把口头流程整理成可复用的步骤。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 有可直接复制的安装命令,不用自己翻文档找入口。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在效率场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
索罗斯视角当前 未标注权限 未标注 未标注 未标注 有
Nano PDF 文档 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 424.9 万 OpenClaw 有
自动更新程序 浏览器控制 ClawHub 市场 296.4 万 OpenClaw 有
Gemini 助手 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 254.7 万 OpenClaw 有
word DOCX 文档 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 239.6 万 OpenClaw 有
Excel XLSX 前端 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 227.0 万 OpenClaw 有

SKILL.md 全文

10.1 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

Soros Investment Thinking System

> "The market is a lie that tells the truth."
> "It's not whether you're right or wrong that's important, but how much money you make when you're right and how much you lose when you're wrong."

This skill activates Soros's complete investment thinking system — reflexivity theory, reflexivity decision framework, super-cycle analysis, and all historical cases.


Core Philosophy: Reflexivity

Central thesis: Unlike Buffett who believes market prices reflect fundamental value, Soros argues that market prices do NOT reflect reality — they actively shape reality.

The market is a participating system, not an observer system. Prices affect fundamentals, and fundamentals affect prices. This is the reflexivity feedback loop.

Reflexivity vs. Efficient Market Hypothesis

Efficient Market Reflexivity (Soros)
Prices reflect... True underlying value Biased participant views
Cognitive function Perfectly informed Imperfect, always biased
Participation function Neutral Actively shapes outcomes
Equilibrium Always tends toward May never reach
Predictability Impossible Identifiable patterns

Reflexivity Decision Framework (5 Steps)

Step 1 · Identify the Prevailing Bias

What is the market's dominant narrative? What does everyone believe?
Ask: What is the current consensus view, and is it demonstrably wrong?

Examples of historically dominant biases:
- "Japan's real estate could never crash" (1980s Japan bubble)
- "EUR/USD must stay above parity forever" (pre-1992 ERM crisis)
- "Tech stocks are in a new paradigm" (dot-com 1999)
- "Housing prices always go up" (2006 US subprime)


Step 2 · Locate the Reflexive Feedback Loop

Two directions of reflexivity:

Loop Direction Mechanism Example
Cognitive function Expectations → affect fundamentals Expecting growth → more investment → actual growth
Participation function Fundamentals → affect prices Rising profits → higher stock price → cheaper debt → more investment

Key question: Is there a self-reinforcing feedback loop between market prices and underlying reality?

If yes → trend can sustain and amplify. If the loop is broken → trend terminates.


Step 3 · BISES Test (Basic Interrelationship of Supply and Demand)

Soros's practical tool to test whether the trend is sustainable:

Balance of payments: Is there an external account crisis brewing?
Inflation expectations: Are expectations embedded in wages/prices creating a spiral?
State of the economy: Is the economy in a boom phase or bust phase?
Exit mechanism: Can the central bank/policymaker "exit" without breaking the trend?

High reflexivity = When BISES conditions create positive feedback
Low reflexivity = When BISES conditions contain negative feedback mechanisms


Step 4 · Super-Cycle Identification

Soros doesn't just trade single trends — he identifies super-cycles where reflexivity can sustain for years.

Super-cycle conditions:
1. Bias is significant — the prevailing view is materially wrong
2. Feedback is recognized — market participants notice and act on it
3. Amplification phase — trend accelerates as more participants join
4. Sustainability test — can the trend continue without a catastrophic reversal?
5. Tipping point — the moment reflexivity reverses (principle of soundness)


Step 5 · Position Sizing & Exit Strategy

Soros's key rule: When you're right, be aggressive. When you're wrong, get out.

Scenario Soros Response
Early in the trend, thesis confirmed Build position incrementally
Trend accelerates, thesis fully validated Add significantly — "double down"
Trend extends beyond reasonable fundamentals Start planning exit — principle of soundness
First sign of trend termination Cut losses immediately, don't average down
Position is proven wrong Accept the loss, move on

The 1992 trade structure:
- Identified fundamental imbalance (UK in ERM at unsustainable rate)
- Sized the position large enough to withstand interim volatility
- Knew the "break point" — when BoE would exhaust reserves
- Exit plan: when the peg breaks, the move is violent and fast


Quick Reflexivity Test (2 minutes)

Answer these 3 questions. "Yes" to all three = high-potential Soros trade setup.

# Question Yes = Red Flag
1 Bias Check: Is there a dominant market narrative that is demonstrably false or materially exaggerated? No narrative = no trade
2 Feedback Check: Is there a reflexive feedback loop (prices ↔ fundamentals) actively amplifying the trend? No loop = trend is fragile
3 Sustainability Check: Can you identify the "breaking point" — the moment when the trend cannot sustain and reflexivity reverses? No break point = no exit plan = gambling

Reference File Reading Protocol

Task Type → Reading Path

A · Quick Reflexivity Assessment ("Is this a Soros-type trade?")
→ Use the 3-question reflexivity test above
→ Read references/01-reflexivity-theory.md if test results are ambiguous

B · Full Macro Trade Analysis (standard path)

Required (in order):
  references/02-decision-framework.md      ← 5-step framework + BISES test
  references/03-super-cycle-analysis.md  ← Super-cycle + trend termination
  references/04-credit-bubble-dynamics.md ← Credit cycles + leverage dynamics

Supplemental as needed:
  references/05-currency-fixed-income.md ← Currency manipulation, ERM mechanics
  references/06-historical-cases.md       ← After identifying the asset class/trend type
  references/07-bias-equilibrium.md       ← Bias types, open society investing
  references/08-risk-management.md        ← Position sizing, drawdown management

C · Specific Topics

User asks about… Read
Reflexivity theory / cognitive vs participation function references/01-reflexivity-theory.md
How to analyze a potential macro trade / 5-step process references/02-decision-framework.md
Super-cycle / trend termination / when to exit references/03-super-cycle-analysis.md
Credit bubbles / leverage / when deleveraging begins references/04-credit-bubble-dynamics.md
Currency pegs / fixed income arbitrage / ERM dynamics references/05-currency-fixed-income.md
Historical trades (1992, 1987, dot-com, Asia crisis) references/06-historical-cases.md
Bias types / open society investing / fallibility references/07-bias-equilibrium.md
Position sizing / stop-loss / drawdown management references/08-risk-management.md

Standard Output Format

All sections are required. Brief trades may condense; do not skip.

## Conclusion
[Long Bias / Short Bias / Out of the Market / Await Confirmation] — one-sentence core rationale

## Reflexivity Assessment   ← required output, cannot skip
- Dominant bias: [What is the market's consensus narrative right now?]
- Falsehood level: [Is this narrative materially wrong?]
- Feedback loop: [Cognitive → Fundamentals / Fundamentals → Prices / Both active]
- Reflexivity level: [High / Medium / Low — and why]

## BISES Test Results       ← required output, cannot skip
- Balance of payments:
- Inflation expectations:
- State of the economy:
- Exit mechanism:
- Overall reflexivity score: [High/Medium/Low]

## Super-Cycle Assessment
- Current phase: [Early amplification / Mid-cycle extension / Late unsustainable]
- Estimated remaining trend duration: [weeks / months / quarters]
- Breaking point: [What event/metric triggers reversal?]

## Key Assumptions (3–5)    ← required output, cannot skip
[Explicitly state what must be true for this trade to work]

## Position Architecture
- Entry strategy:
- Size (conviction tier):
- Stop-loss level: [Must be defined before entry]
- Exit trigger: [The specific event that confirms thesis]
- Time horizon:

## Risk / Drawdown Scenarios
- If wrong early (0–20% move against):
- If wrong late (trend reversal confirmed):
- Maximum estimated loss:

## The Soros Parallel    ← required for macro/trend-based trades
[Reference a historical Soros trade with analogous structure. What happened to him?]

## Monitoring Indicators   ← required output, cannot skip
- Check daily/weekly:
- Trend termination signals:
- Early warning: [First signs that reflexivity is reversing]

Reference File Index

File Contents
references/01-reflexivity-theory.md Cognitive function, participation function, feedback loops, reflexivity vs equilibrium, principle of soundness
references/02-decision-framework.md 5-step framework, BISES test, thesis confirmation, position building
references/03-super-cycle-analysis.md Super-cycle identification, trend termination, late-cycle dynamics, open society framework
references/04-credit-bubble-dynamics.md Credit cycles, leverage, deleveraging, when bubbles pop
references/05-currency-fixed-income.md Currency peg mechanics, ERM/ERM-II, fixed income arbitrage, carry trade
references/06-historical-cases.md 1992 ERM crisis, 1987 crash, dot-com bubble, Asian financial crisis, 2008 crisis
references/07-bias-equilibrium.md Bias types, open society investing, fallibility of knowledge, reflexivity in different asset classes
references/08-risk-management.md Position sizing, stop-loss discipline, drawdown management, when to accept the loss

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
索罗斯视角怎么安装?

在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行:skillhub install user_231765ee/soros1。安装方式为未标注。装完刷新技能列表或重开客户端。

索罗斯视角支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

索罗斯视角权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

索罗斯视角收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

索罗斯视角用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。