物流AndLaunch

SKILLAI 工具
AI 工具 未标注权限 许可证不明确
安装这个技能

物流AndLaunch专用技能,帮助AI Agent高效完成相关任务。

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

物流AndLaunch是AI 工具类的 Agent Skill,安装方式未标注,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,有可直接复制的安装命令。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类AI 工具 安装方式未标注 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 未标注
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

未标注
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
skillhub install user_3c6cb52e/shipping-and-launch-sh-2imo4r
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    执行上面的命令安装;也可以把仓库里的 SKILL.md 手动放进客户端的 skills 目录。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

AI 工具
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方user_3c6cb52e仓库 未标注 · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式未标注安装包 community
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 1791681718
正文体量10.1 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
组合多个 AI 能力

把写作、检索、总结串成一条流程。

搭工作流

把固定流程做成可重复调用的步骤。

做提示词与评测

整理提示词并对比输出效果。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 有可直接复制的安装命令,不用自己翻文档找入口。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在AI 工具场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
物流AndLaunch当前 未标注权限 未标注 未标注 未标注 有
执行计划 只读 GitHub 仓库 151.5 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Playwright MCP 测试 浏览器控制 ClawHub 市场 136.5 万 OpenClaw 有
完成前的验证 未标注权限 GitHub 仓库 131.9 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
子 Agent 驱动开发 只读 GitHub 仓库 131.2 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
前端设计 执行命令 GitHub 仓库 125.6 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有

SKILL.md 全文

10.1 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

Shipping and Launch

Overview

Ship with confidence. The goal is not just to deploy — it's to deploy safely, with monitoring in place, a rollback plan ready, and a clear understanding of what success looks like. Every launch should be reversible, observable, and incremental.

When to Use

  • Deploying a feature to production for the first time
  • Releasing a significant change to users
  • Migrating data or infrastructure
  • Opening a beta or early access program
  • Any deployment that carries risk (all of them)

The Pre-Launch Checklist

Code Quality

  • [ ] All tests pass (unit, integration, e2e)
  • [ ] Build succeeds with no warnings
  • [ ] Lint and type checking pass
  • [ ] Code reviewed and approved
  • [ ] No TODO comments that should be resolved before launch
  • [ ] No console.log debugging statements in production code
  • [ ] Error handling covers expected failure modes

Security

  • [ ] No secrets in code or version control
  • [ ] npm audit shows no critical or high vulnerabilities
  • [ ] Input validation on all user-facing endpoints
  • [ ] Authentication and authorization checks in place
  • [ ] Security headers configured (CSP, HSTS, etc.)
  • [ ] Rate limiting on authentication endpoints
  • [ ] CORS configured to specific origins (not wildcard)

Performance

  • [ ] Core Web Vitals within "Good" thresholds
  • [ ] No N+1 queries in critical paths
  • [ ] Images optimized (compression, responsive sizes, lazy loading)
  • [ ] Bundle size within budget
  • [ ] Database queries have appropriate indexes
  • [ ] Caching configured for static assets and repeated queries

Accessibility

  • [ ] Keyboard navigation works for all interactive elements
  • [ ] Screen reader can convey page content and structure
  • [ ] Color contrast meets WCAG 2.1 AA (4.5:1 for text)
  • [ ] Focus management correct for modals and dynamic content
  • [ ] Error messages are descriptive and associated with form fields
  • [ ] No accessibility warnings in axe-core or Lighthouse

Infrastructure

  • [ ] Environment variables set in production
  • [ ] Database migrations applied (or ready to apply)
  • [ ] DNS and SSL configured
  • [ ] CDN configured for static assets
  • [ ] Logging and error reporting configured
  • [ ] Health check endpoint exists and responds

Documentation

  • [ ] README updated with any new setup requirements
  • [ ] API documentation current
  • [ ] ADRs written for any architectural decisions
  • [ ] Changelog updated
  • [ ] User-facing documentation updated (if applicable)

Feature Flag Strategy

Ship behind feature flags to decouple deployment from release:

// Feature flag check
const flags = await getFeatureFlags(userId);

if (flags.taskSharing) {
  // New feature: task sharing
  return <TaskSharingPanel task={task} />;
}

// Default: existing behavior
return null;

Feature flag lifecycle:

1. DEPLOY with flag OFF     → Code is in production but inactive
2. ENABLE for team/beta     → Internal testing in production environment
3. GRADUAL ROLLOUT          → 5% → 25% → 50% → 100% of users
4. MONITOR at each stage    → Watch error rates, performance, user feedback
5. CLEAN UP                 → Remove flag and dead code path after full rollout

Rules:
- Every feature flag has an owner and an expiration date
- Clean up flags within 2 weeks of full rollout
- Don't nest feature flags (creates exponential combinations)
- Test both flag states (on and off) in CI

Staged Rollout

The Rollout Sequence

1. DEPLOY to staging
   └── Full test suite in staging environment
   └── Manual smoke test of critical flows

2. DEPLOY to production (feature flag OFF)
   └── Verify deployment succeeded (health check)
   └── Check error monitoring (no new errors)

3. ENABLE for team (flag ON for internal users)
   └── Team uses the feature in production
   └── 24-hour monitoring window

4. CANARY rollout (flag ON for 5% of users)
   └── Monitor error rates, latency, user behavior
   └── Compare metrics: canary vs. baseline
   └── 24-48 hour monitoring window
   └── Advance only if all thresholds pass (see table below)

5. GRADUAL increase (25% -> 50% -> 100%)
   └── Same monitoring at each step
   └── Ability to roll back to previous percentage at any point

6. FULL rollout (flag ON for all users)
   └── Monitor for 1 week
   └── Clean up feature flag

Rollout Decision Thresholds

Use these thresholds to decide whether to advance, hold, or roll back at each stage:

Metric Advance (green) Hold and investigate (yellow) Roll back (red)
Error rate Within 10% of baseline 10-100% above baseline >2x baseline
P95 latency Within 20% of baseline 20-50% above baseline >50% above baseline
Client JS errors No new error types New errors at <0.1% of sessions New errors at >0.1% of sessions
Business metrics Neutral or positive Decline <5% (may be noise) Decline >5%

When to Roll Back

Roll back immediately if:
- Error rate increases by more than 2x baseline
- P95 latency increases by more than 50%
- User-reported issues spike
- Data integrity issues detected
- Security vulnerability discovered

Monitoring and Observability

What to Monitor

Application metrics:
├── Error rate (total and by endpoint)
├── Response time (p50, p95, p99)
├── Request volume
├── Active users
└── Key business metrics (conversion, engagement)

Infrastructure metrics:
├── CPU and memory utilization
├── Database connection pool usage
├── Disk space
├── Network latency
└── Queue depth (if applicable)

Client metrics:
├── Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS)
├── JavaScript errors
├── API error rates from client perspective
└── Page load time

Error Reporting

// Set up error boundary with reporting
class ErrorBoundary extends React.Component {
  componentDidCatch(error: Error, info: React.ErrorInfo) {
    // Report to error tracking service
    reportError(error, {
      componentStack: info.componentStack,
      userId: getCurrentUser()?.id,
      page: window.location.pathname,
    });
  }

  render() {
    if (this.state.hasError) {
      return &lt;ErrorFallback onRetry={() =&gt; this.setState({ hasError: false })} /&gt;;
    }
    return this.props.children;
  }
}

// Server-side error reporting
app.use((err: Error, req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) =&gt; {
  reportError(err, {
    method: req.method,
    url: req.url,
    userId: req.user?.id,
  });

  // Don&#x27;t expose internals to users
  res.status(500).json({
    error: { code: &#x27;INTERNAL_ERROR&#x27;, message: &#x27;Something went wrong&#x27; },
  });
});

Post-Launch Verification

In the first hour after launch:

1. Check health endpoint returns 200
2. Check error monitoring dashboard (no new error types)
3. Check latency dashboard (no regression)
4. Test the critical user flow manually
5. Verify logs are flowing and readable
6. Confirm rollback mechanism works (dry run if possible)

Rollback Strategy

Every deployment needs a rollback plan before it happens:

## Rollback Plan for [Feature/Release]

### Trigger Conditions
- Error rate &gt; 2x baseline
- P95 latency &gt; [X]ms
- User reports of [specific issue]

### Rollback Steps
1. Disable feature flag (if applicable)
   OR
1. Deploy previous version: `git revert &lt;commit&gt; &amp;&amp; git push`
2. Verify rollback: health check, error monitoring
3. Communicate: notify team of rollback

### Database Considerations
- Migration [X] has a rollback: `npx prisma migrate rollback`
- Data inserted by new feature: [preserved / cleaned up]

### Time to Rollback
- Feature flag: &lt; 1 minute
- Redeploy previous version: &lt; 5 minutes
- Database rollback: &lt; 15 minutes

See Also

  • For the project-wide Definition of Done that every change must clear before this checklist, see references/definition-of-done.md
  • For security pre-launch checks, see references/security-checklist.md
  • For performance pre-launch checklist, see references/performance-checklist.md
  • For accessibility verification before launch, see references/accessibility-checklist.md

Common Rationalizations

Rationalization Reality
"It works in staging, it'll work in production" Production has different data, traffic patterns, and edge cases. Monitor after deploy.
"We don't need feature flags for this" Every feature benefits from a kill switch. Even "simple" changes can break things.
"Monitoring is overhead" Not having monitoring means you discover problems from user complaints instead of dashboards.
"We'll add monitoring later" Add it before launch. You can't debug what you can't see.
"Rolling back is admitting failure" Rolling back is responsible engineering. Shipping a broken feature is the failure.

Red Flags

  • Deploying without a rollback plan
  • No monitoring or error reporting in production
  • Big-bang releases (everything at once, no staging)
  • Feature flags with no expiration or owner
  • No one monitoring the deploy for the first hour
  • Production environment configuration done by memory, not code
  • "It's Friday afternoon, let's ship it"

Verification

Before deploying:

  • [ ] Pre-launch checklist completed (all sections green)
  • [ ] Feature flag configured (if applicable)
  • [ ] Rollback plan documented
  • [ ] Monitoring dashboards set up
  • [ ] Team notified of deployment

After deploying:

  • [ ] Health check returns 200
  • [ ] Error rate is normal
  • [ ] Latency is normal
  • [ ] Critical user flow works
  • [ ] Logs are flowing
  • [ ] Rollback tested or verified ready

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
物流AndLaunch怎么安装?

在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行:skillhub install user_3c6cb52e/shipping-and-launch-sh-2imo4r。安装方式为未标注。装完刷新技能列表或重开客户端。

物流AndLaunch支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

物流AndLaunch权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

物流AndLaunch收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

物流AndLaunch用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。