Scientific Analysis

SKILL研究检索
研究检索 未标注权限 许可证不明确
安装这个技能

Use when a research or analysis question genuinely needs code to produce a computed result (a statistic, model fit, plot, or data transform) — run one reproducible, self-contained analysis and write a traceable result index. Not for literature or database lookups.

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

Scientific Analysis是研究检索类的 Agent Skill,安装方式未标注,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,有可直接复制的安装命令。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类研究检索 安装方式未标注 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 未标注
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

未标注
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
skillhub install user_6f51faad/scientific-analysis
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    执行上面的命令安装;也可以把仓库里的 SKILL.md 手动放进客户端的 skills 目录。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

研究检索
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方user_6f51faad仓库 未标注 · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式未标注安装包 community
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 1791730623
正文体量5.2 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
查资料并整理出处

让模型按主题查资料,并把引用来源整理成清单。

网页与文献要点提炼

把长文、论文、网页压成能直接看的要点。

竞品与行业汇总

按关键词汇总竞品动态与行业信息。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 有可直接复制的安装命令,不用自己翻文档找入口。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在研究检索场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
Scientific Analysis当前 未标注权限 未标注 未标注 未标注 有
寻找技能 浏览器控制 GitHub 仓库 3120.0 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
自我改进 Agent 接触敏感数据 ClawHub 市场 1646.4 万 OpenClaw 有
灵魂追踪 联网访问 GitHub 仓库 758.9 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
自我完善 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 682.9 万 OpenClaw 有
微软代工厂 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 661.4 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有

SKILL.md 全文

5.2 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

Scientific Analysis

Run one bounded, reproducible computational analysis — only when a question genuinely needs code (a statistic, a model fit, a plot, a data transform). Work in one self-contained directory, and make every artifact traceable so someone can re-run and get the same numbers. You do not write the surrounding report, and you leave other analyses alone.

First: is code actually needed?

Do not run code reflexively. Code is warranted when the question needs a computed result from data — a statistic, a fit, a transform, a figure. It is not warranted when the answer is a literature or database fact, or when a one-line reasoning step settles it.

If code is not needed, finalize immediately with status: "success" and a conclusion stating why no computation was required. An honest "no analysis needed" beats busywork.

Working directory

Create one analysis directory for the task and work only inside it. Name it after the analysis (e.g. analysis/treatment-effect/), and use this layout:

analysis/<analysis-name>/
├── run.py            your script — re-runnable, no hidden state
├── inputs/           input data, or a stable reference to it
├── outputs/          tables, figures, computed artifacts
├── run.log           stdout+stderr of the run
├── environment.json  written by the finalize helper
└── result.json       written by the finalize helper

Workflow

  1. Set up. Create the analysis directory with inputs/ and outputs/. Put the input data (or a small file recording a stable URL/reference to it) in inputs/ so the run is reproducible.
  2. Write run.py. Re-runnable from scratch: read from inputs/, write every artifact to outputs/, no dependence on interactive state. Python is the standard runtime; pandas/numpy/matplotlib are commonly available. Keep it readable — someone must re-run it to reproduce your numbers.
  3. Run it, capturing the log:
    bash cd analysis/<analysis-name> && python run.py > run.log 2>&1; echo "exit=$?"
  4. Handle failure honestly. If the run fails, do not invent a result. Read run.log; if the cause is yours, fix run.py and retry a bounded number of times. If it still fails, finalize with status: "failed" and put the real cause (a stderr summary) in warnings. A failed run recorded truthfully is a valid outcome; a fabricated number is not.
  5. Finalize. Call the bundled helper (below) to capture the environment and write environment.json and result.json.
  6. Report, then stop. Read result.json and give a short summary of the finding plus the result path. Do not echo large outputs back into the conversation.

Finalizing

The helper scripts/finalize_analysis.py ships inside this skill, next to this SKILL.md. Resolve its path relative to this skill's directory — never a hard-coded absolute path — then run it from the analysis directory (or point --analysis-dir at it):

python <this-skill-dir>/scripts/finalize_analysis.py \
  --task-id <analysis-name> \
  --analysis-dir analysis/<analysis-name> <<'JSON'
{
  "status": "success",
  "conclusion": "IL-6 knockout reduced mean fibrosis area from 12.4% to 7.1% (t-test p=0.003, n=8/group).",
  "script": "run.py",
  "inputs": ["inputs/fibrosis_areas.csv"],
  "outputs": [
    {"path": "outputs/boxplot.png", "type": "figure", "description": "Fibrosis area by genotype"},
    {"path": "outputs/stats.csv", "type": "table", "description": "Group means and t-test result"}
  ],
  "warnings": [],
  "limitations": ["Single cohort; no multiple-testing correction."]
}
JSON

The helper writes environment.json (python version, platform, installed packages) and result.json, both atomically. Every path you list in inputs/outputs is an artifact others will trace numbers back to — only list files that actually exist.

If code was not needed (first section), finalize the same way with status: "success" and the explanatory conclusion — the helper still records the environment and a valid result.

Guardrails

  • Reproducibility is the point. Inputs, script, environment, and outputs must let someone re-run and get the same numbers. If an input cannot be bundled, record a stable reference to it in inputs/.
  • Never present a failed or fabricated run as a result. Numbers in conclusion/outputs must come from an actual successful run recorded in run.log.
  • Stay self-contained. One analysis, one analysis/<analysis-name>/ directory. Do not reach into other directories.
  • No Jupyter dependency. Plain scripts only; do not require a notebook server to reproduce the work.

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
Scientific Analysis怎么安装?

在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行:skillhub install user_6f51faad/scientific-analysis。安装方式为未标注。装完刷新技能列表或重开客户端。

Scientific Analysis支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

Scientific Analysis权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

Scientific Analysis收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

Scientific Analysis用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。