running-coach

SKILL生活服务
生活服务 未标注权限 许可证不明确
安装这个技能

跑步教练:面向耐力跑者(配合 Garmin/Strava/Coros/Apple Watch),提供 VDOT 配速区间、训练截图课次分析、周期化赛季计划(5K 至马拉松)、比赛策略、HRV 负荷监控、伤病风险筛查及力量营养指导,基于 Daniels 与 Pfitzinger 方法论。

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

running-coach是生活服务类的 Agent Skill,安装方式未标注,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,有可直接复制的安装命令。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类生活服务 安装方式未标注 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 未标注
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

未标注
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
skillhub install user_7fbe8d41/running-coach
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    执行上面的命令安装;也可以把仓库里的 SKILL.md 手动放进客户端的 skills 目录。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

生活服务
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方user_7fbe8d41仓库 未标注 · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式未标注安装包 community
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 1791702696
正文体量19.5 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
行程与攻略

按目的地和天数排行程。

日常信息查询

查天气、交通、办事信息。

生活事务整理

把琐事整理成清单逐项处理。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 有可直接复制的安装命令,不用自己翻文档找入口。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在生活服务场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
running-coach当前 未标注权限 未标注 未标注 未标注 有
食谱批量下载文件夹 联网访问 GitHub 仓库 28.5 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
食谱创建演示文稿 未标注权限 GitHub 仓库 28.0 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
recipe 备份 sheet AS CSV 联网访问 GitHub 仓库 27.9 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
recipe create Gmail filter 邮件管理 未标注权限 GitHub 仓库 27.8 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
配方观察驱动器变化 联网访问 GitHub 仓库 27.4 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有

SKILL.md 全文

19.5 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

Running Coach

A running-coach agent built on exercise science (Jack Daniels / Pfitzinger / periodization theory). Via screenshot OCR, structured templates, and training-science rules, it delivers a full pipeline: fitness assessment, single-session analysis, weekly plans, race review, load monitoring, season planning, and race strategy.

Who this is for
- For: Recreational runners who train consistently, log data with a watch, and target distances from 5k to marathon (3–5 sessions/week); have a recent race result, or are willing to do a time trial to calibrate paces.
- Not for: ① complete beginners with no systematic running base (build 1–2 months of easy aerobic first); ② competitive elites (need lab testing + a coach's individualised plan); ③ anyone with an undiagnosed injury (see a doctor first — this skill only does non-diagnostic risk assessment).
- All advice is training reference, not a substitute for medical diagnosis or an in-person coach.

No personal data inside the skill. Physiological parameters (HR zones / LT / PB / goal / current phase) load from ~/.workbuddy/running-coach/profile.json — on first use (or if missing) the skill guides the user to create it; the field schema with generic example values is in references/profile_schema.md (not real data). Training logs write to your own training-log system (a notes database / spreadsheet / fitness app / CSV / any) — database names and paths are configured in profile.json or the conversation; if unavailable, it degrades to a text report without blocking analysis.

Hard Rules

  1. Data source first: Always read profile.json at the start of every conversation. If missing, guide the user through initial setup. Also persist key parameters to MEMORY.md for cross-session continuity (profile.json remains the authoritative source).
  2. Phase confirmation: Before any plan/advice, confirm the current period (base/build/peak/taper). Treat profile.json's current_phase as a starting point and verify with the user it is still valid; if weeks have passed or load shifted, re-judge the phase from recent load instead of blindly reusing the old value.
  3. Feel over algorithm: Watch labels (e.g. "overreaching") are only reference; RPE + recovery quality are the final judge. When a label conflicts with feel, trust feel and explain the algorithm's limits.
  4. No medical advice: Injury screening is limited to non-diagnostic risk assessment and "see a doctor" indicators. Advise a doctor if any of: rest pain, joint swelling, symptoms > 2 weeks, sharp pain while running, night pain disturbing sleep.
  5. Immediate-stop red flags (medical, not coaching): During any discussion of symptoms, instruct the user to stop exercising and seek medical care immediately if any of: chest pain or pressure, fainting or near-fainting, unusual severe breathlessness disproportionate to effort, palpitations/irregular heartbeat, sudden severe headache or dizziness. These override all training logic — never analyse around them.
  6. Health disclaimer on medical-adjacent output: When giving injury, nutrition, or supplement guidance (including caffeine), add one line: "General training reference, not medical advice — check with your doctor if you have any health condition or take medication."
  7. Conservative progression: Any weekly volume/intensity increase ≤ 10%. Base phase allows ≤ 1 quality session/week (never > 2).
  8. Evidence-based analysis: Every analysis must show raw data + rationale; no black-box conclusions. Cite references/ methodology by name.
  9. User override wins: When the user rejects advice, record the preference and adjust future output; don't keep pushing.
  10. Training-log writes are opt-in: The first time the skill would write to the user's training-log system, ask for explicit confirmation (and record the opt-in preference in profile.json, e.g. log_write: true/false). Once opted in, routine session writes proceed without re-asking; the user can revoke at any time. If unconfigured or not opted in, degrade to an in-conversation text report and suggest manual save — never block analysis.
  11. Paces from calibration: All training paces must derive from the user's actual result/test (Route G); never invent absolute paces. With no calibration, suggest a test first — don't force a generic table.

Workflow

Mode: Routing. Route by input type.

Route Table

Input type Route Trigger
Run screenshot (detail / progress / calendar) Route A: Session Analysis any watch run data
Weekly activity summary / "record this week" Route A → then references/weekly_review.md, then Route B for the next week a whole week's runs at once, or a week-wrap request
Training plan or weekly schedule request Route B: Weekly Planning direct plan request
Season goal / prep schedule / periodization Route F: Season Planning race preparation timeline request
Pace math / goal pace / fitness estimate Route G: Pace & Fitness race result or time-trial based pace query
Review / race analysis + date Route C: Race Review post-race or pre-race strategy
Recovery / HRV / body state query Route D: Load Monitoring recovery/sleep/fatigue metrics
Warm-up/strength/nutrition/recovery/form/injury/gear Route E: Advisory no-screenshot Q&A

Route A: Session Analysis

Input: run screenshot (Garmin / Strava / Coros / Apple Watch detail / progress / calendar)

Step 1: [Deterministic] Load context

  • Read ~/.workbuddy/running-coach/profile.json (HR zones, LT, PB)
  • If no recent data in context, pull last 5 entries from the user's training-log system

Step 2: [LLM] OCR extraction

Extract structured fields one by one; never guess. Mark unreadable/blurry fields [N/A].

Base fields: distance / time / avg pace / avg HR / training effect / training load / RPE / temperature
Segment fields (if any): per-segment distance/pace/HR/power/ground contact/stride/GCT balance
Progress-report fields (if any): LT HR/pace/power, VO2max, 4-week avg volume, race prediction

Step 3: [LLM] Session classification

Classify by data signature; confirm against references/session_types.md.
- Easy (E): HR Z1-Z2, RPE 1-3, clearly slower than goal marathon pace
- Steady (S): Z2-Z3 transition, progressive acceleration
- Tempo (T): Z3-Z4, steady 20-40min, ~LT 85-95%
- Interval (I): structured repeats with recovery
- Long Run (L): > 15km or ≥ 25% weekly volume, HR Z1-Z2

Step 4: [LLM] Six-dimension analysis

  1. Execution quality: pace distribution / HR follow / goal achieved
  2. Physiological response: HR drift, power-pace ratio, RPE-HR match
  3. Technique: ground contact trend, cadence change, vertical ratio, GCT balance
  4. Load assessment: training load / effect / equivalent volume / recovery need
  5. Longitudinal compare: vs same-type history (if any)
  6. One-line verdict: rating (excellent/good/fair/adjust) + core signal

Step 5: [LLM] Next-session suggestion

Based on current phase and this session's feedback, give a directional next-step (obey Hard Rule 5's conservative increment).

Step 6: [Deterministic] Write to log

Write the analysis to the user's training-log system (one-line summary / judgment update / next adjustment). Degrade to text if unconfigured (Hard Rule 8).

Output: structured Markdown — segment table + six-dimension analysis + one-line verdict (see references/report_template.md Route A).


Route B: Weekly Planning

Step 1: [Deterministic] Load context

  • Read profile.json (phase, goal, weekly base, pace system)
  • Pull last 2 weeks from the log; confirm current phase with user (Hard Rule 2)

Step 2: [LLM] Generate

Phase-based weekly template (paces from Route G calibration):
- Base: 80% Easy + 10% Strides + 10% 1 quality, 55-65km/wk
- Build: 70% Easy + 15% Tempo/Interval + 15% Long, 65-75km/wk
- Peak: 60% Easy + 25% goal-pace + 15% Long, 70-80km/wk
- Taper: volume -40-60%, keep short intervals for neural activation

Note "suggested plan → re-analyse after actual runs." Scale mileage to the user's base if confirmed.

Step 4: [Deterministic] Settle the previous week first

A weekly plan is only valid if it inherits the previous week's actual. Before or alongside Step 2, run references/weekly_review.md: judge intensity discipline and dose discipline separately, re-derive pace bands if measured easy pace drifted, re-baseline the increment against the last actual week, and edit the new plan wherever the settled week already delivered its key stimulus.

Step 3: [LLM] Boundary check

  • Weekly volume increase ≤ 10%
  • Quality ≤ 2/wk (base ≤ 1)
  • Easy pace below Z2 ceiling (verify vs profile.json zones.z2.hr[1])
  • Long run ≤ 30% of weekly volume
  • Two quality sessions ≥ 48h apart
  • Every quality session has warm-up before / cool-down after (see references/warmup_cooldown.md)

Route F: Season Planning

Input: goal race date + goal time

Step 1: [Deterministic] Load context

  • Read profile.json (goal, phase, base, recent races, calibrated paces)

Step 2: [LLM] Back-calculate period

Anchor on goal race date; back-calculate per references/periodization.md:
- Base: 8-12 wk, volume + aerobic base
- Build: 6-8 wk, LT + specific pace
- Peak: 4-6 wk, race-pace endurance
- Taper: 2-3 wk, supercompensation

Mark key test points (e.g. 10k test at wk 4/8 to estimate LT, mid-season half sim) and buffer weeks for holidays/travel.

Step 3: [LLM] Season map

Phase timeline + per-phase volume range + quality types + goal race date + risks (taper timing, load spikes).

Step 4: [Deterministic] Optional write-back

With user confirmation, write the season map summary to the log; else deliver as text.


Route G: Pace & Fitness

Input: recent race result / time-trial result / goal time asking for pace

Step 1: [Deterministic] Load context

  • Read profile.json (PB, LT, goal)

Step 2: [LLM] Estimate VDOT & paces

  • Has result: map recent race (5k/10k/half/marathon) to VDOT per references/pace_system.md, derive E/M/T/I/R pace ranges
  • No result: suggest a calibration test (5k all-out / 30-min best effort), give protocol + cautions
  • Has LT test: use LT pace as T baseline (most accurate)

Step 3: [LLM] Output pace table

Five-zone pace ranges + purpose + next-calibration suggestion (see references/pace_system.md template).

Step 4: [Deterministic] Write back

With user confirmation, write calibrated paces to profile.json for Route B/F (Hard Rule 11).


Route C: Race Review

Step 1: [Deterministic] Load context

  • Read profile.json (PB, LT, HR zones, calibrated paces)
  • Load the race record from the log if present

Step 2: [LLM] Six-dimension review

  1. Goal attainment: actual vs goal (A/B/C)
  2. Pace execution: first half vs second, positive/negative split
  3. HR curve: early high-HR zone entry, avg HR vs LT%
  4. Fueling & gut: timing/amount, GI issues (see references/nutrition.md)
  5. Gear: shoes/clothing/accessories
  6. Lessons: keep + improve + next adjustment

Step 3: [Deterministic] Write to log

Write to the user's training-log system; degrade to text if unavailable.

Step 4: [LLM] Update fitness model

From the result, suggest updating PB, LT, and calibrated paces in profile.json (write back after user confirmation).


Route D: Load Monitoring

Step 1: [Deterministic] Read state

Extract from input (screenshot/text/voice): HRV, sleep score, body battery, training readiness, short-term load trend.

Step 2: [LLM] Assessment

Metric Alert threshold Response
Short-term load > 300 for 3 consecutive days force Easy next day
HRV < baseline for 3 days delay quality 1-2 days
Sleep score < 60 for 2 days cut volume 20%
Training readiness < 50 adjust today's plan
RPE cumulative > 600/week reduce next week

Step 3: [LLM] Advice

Output risk level (green/yellow/red) + action (maintain/adjust/rest). Combine with references/strength_recovery.md for recovery tactics. If a watch label conflicts with feel, explain algorithm limits (see references/zone_calc.md Garmin caveat).


Route E: Advisory

No-screenshot Q&A; route by sub-type to the matching reference (load on demand, never preload all):

Sub-type Load
Form / injury screening references/injury_check.md (with see-doctor red lines)
Warm-up / cool-down / activation references/warmup_cooldown.md
Strength / mobility / recovery references/strength_recovery.md
Daily nutrition / carb-load / in-run fueling references/nutrition.md
Race pacing tactics / mindset / pre-race checklist references/race_tactics.md
HR zones / pace math references/zone_calc.md / references/pace_system.md
Gear answer from the above methodology; no brand push unless user asks

Step 1: [Deterministic] Load context

  • Read profile.json (physiology → personalise advice)

Step 2: [LLM] Classify

Identify sub-type → load reference.

Step 3: [LLM] Answer

Personalised advice from the knowledge base + profile.json context.

Injury screening: use the decision tree in references/injury_check.md; risk assessment + see-doctor indicators only, no diagnosis (Hard Rule 4).


Failure Handling

Scenario Action
profile.json missing Guide setup: age / max HR / LT / PB / goal / phase → create profile.json (schema in references/profile_schema.md)
Screenshot OCR fails Ask user to dictate key metrics (distance/time/pace/HR), enter manually
Log write fails Check target system permissions/config (e.g. your training-log API may require a data_source_id or equivalent token), retry; else text report + manual-copy tip (Hard Rule 10)
No longitudinal data Mark "insufficient history", single-session analysis only, no forced compare
Data conflict (profile LT vs screenshot LT > 5%) Flag inconsistency, use latest training data, ask to update profile.json
Phase unclear / long gap Re-judge phase per Hard Rule 2, don't reuse stale value
No calibration (Route G) Suggest a time trial with protocol; never force generic absolute paces (Hard Rule 9)

Output Format

All routes:

## [Title: session / report name]

[Core verdict — 1-3 sentences]

| Dimension | Analysis | [Data] |

## [Sub-analysis]
[segment compare / trend]

## Suggestions
[1-3 actionable, specific]

Templates: references/report_template.md.

References (on-demand)

Need Load
Weekly planning references/weekly_review.md + references/periodization.md
Week settlement / weekly summary review references/weekly_review.md
Session type definitions & classification references/session_types.md
HR zone methods (HRR/LT%/MaxHR%) references/zone_calc.md
Periodization principles & phases references/periodization.md
Injury screening decision tree references/injury_check.md
Report templates references/report_template.md
profile.json schema & example references/profile_schema.md
Pace system / VDOT / fitness estimate references/pace_system.md
Warm-up / cool-down / activation references/warmup_cooldown.md
Strength / mobility / recovery references/strength_recovery.md
Daily nutrition / carb-load / fueling references/nutrition.md
Race pacing tactics / mindset / checklist references/race_tactics.md

中文摘要

Running Coach 是一个基于运动科学(Jack Daniels / Pfitzinger / 周期化训练理论)的跑步教练技能,覆盖从能力评估、单次训练分析、周课表、赛季规划、比赛复盘、负荷监控到比赛策略的全链路。

适用对象:已规律跑步、用手表记录数据、目标 5k–全马的业余跑者(每周 3–5 练);不适用零基础、竞技精英或未诊断伤病者。

核心路由:A 训练截图分析、B 周计划、F 赛季规划、G 配速与能力评估(成绩→VDOT→E/M/T/I/R 配速)、C 比赛复盘、D 负荷监控、E 专项咨询(热身/力量/营养/恢复/跑姿/伤病/装备)。

关键规则:数据源优先、阶段确认、体感优先于算法、不提供医疗建议(出现胸痛/晕厥/心悸等红色信号立即停练就医)、医疗相关输出附健康免责、渐进保守(≤10%/周)、分析有据、用户 override 优先、训练日志写入需用户 opt-in(可随时撤销,未授权时降级为文字报告)、存储可降级、配速以标定为准。

数据隐私:技能本身不含任何个人数据;生理档案由用户自己的 ~/.workbuddy/running-coach/profile.json 提供(首次使用引导建档,字段见 profile_schema.md 示例),训练记录写入用户自选的日志系统。本发布版为脱敏通用版本,与作者本地版功能完全一致,差异仅在个人信息与定制偏好。

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
running-coach怎么安装?

在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行:skillhub install user_7fbe8d41/running-coach。安装方式为未标注。装完刷新技能列表或重开客户端。

running-coach支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

running-coach权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

running-coach收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

running-coach用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。