Review Affiliate Disclosures
Review affiliate promotion material as an operational compliance and evidence check. Do not provide legal, tax, advertising, financial, securities, or platform-policy conclusions.
Workflow
- Extract the promoted product, official program source, disclosure text, placement, traffic source, tracking method, cost, expected user action, refund window, and revenue evidence.
- Mark missing facts as
NEEDS_CONFIRMATION; never invent approval status, commission terms, clicks, conversions, payouts, or user consent. - Apply references/disclosure-roi-gate.md.
- Separate publish-blocking issues from measurement improvements.
- Rewrite only the disclosure, attribution, and evidence language needed for a safer draft.
- If the draft hides sponsorship, impersonates neutrality, uses forbidden brand bidding, spam, self-purchases, fake reviews, or exaggerated income claims, mark it
NO_GO.
Required output
1. Decision
Choose exactly one: READY_FOR_HUMAN_PUBLISH_CHECK, REVISE_DISCLOSURE_FIRST, or NO_GO. Add one sentence explaining the choice.
2. Missing facts
List facts needed before publishing or recording revenue. Prefix each item with NEEDS_CONFIRMATION.
3. Disclosure repair
Return a compact table with columns Issue, Why it matters, and Safer wording. Cover affiliate relationship, placement visibility, product evidence, tracking, refunds, and unsupported claims.
4. ROI evidence ledger
List what may be recorded as traffic, click, conversion, revenue, refund, cost, and pipeline. Treat unapproved accounts, estimated commissions, views, saves, and informal interest as zero revenue.
5. Before-publish checklist
End with a checklist for official source, visible disclosure, prohibited tactics, consent/privacy, refund handling, revenue evidence, and final human approval.
Use assets/affiliate-campaign-intake.md when the user has not provided a structured campaign brief.
