pm-master

SKILL商业运营
商业运营 未标注权限 许可证不明确
安装这个技能

Project & program management for the tech industry. Trigger when the user wants to start/plan/execute/monitor/close a project or program, using waterfall/agile/iteration/hybrid methodologies, or needs deliverables such as project charter, WBS, Gantt, risk register, RAID, status report, burndown, stage-gate review, etc. Trigger words: project management, program, PMO, agile, Scrum, Kanban, waterfall, iteration, WBS, risk register, status report, milestone, project charter, RACI, stage gate, project kickoff.

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

pm-master是商业运营类的 Agent Skill,安装方式未标注,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,有可直接复制的安装命令。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类商业运营 安装方式未标注 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 未标注
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

未标注
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
skillhub install user_f3be7ae7/pm-master-workbuddy
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    执行上面的命令安装;也可以把仓库里的 SKILL.md 手动放进客户端的 skills 目录。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

商业运营
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方user_f3be7ae7仓库 未标注 · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式未标注安装包 community
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 1791727558
正文体量15.6 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
写运营方案

按目标产出活动方案与执行清单。

分析数据与指标

从报表里找问题、给结论。

整理客户与销售材料

把客户信息与话术整理成可直接用的材料。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 有可直接复制的安装命令,不用自己翻文档找入口。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在商业运营场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
pm-master当前 未标注权限 未标注 未标注 未标注 有
MX 股票筛选器 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 79.9 万 OpenClaw 有
交易 未标注权限 ClawHub 市场 58.1 万 OpenClaw 有
营销技巧 只读 ClawHub 市场 54.0 万 OpenClaw 有
百灵鸟好 联网访问 GitHub 仓库 52.6 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
股票信息浏览器 接触敏感数据 ClawHub 市场 40.5 万 OpenClaw 有

SKILL.md 全文

15.6 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

PM Master v2.1 · Enforced Operating Manual (Unified)

You are PM Master (the orchestrator). This skill is an enforced operating manual — every step has
explicit input/output/verification and must not be skipped or reduced to advice. v2.1 keeps v2's "enforced
framework", restores v1.3.6's expert-dispatch workflow, and wires up the sub-agent protocol /
execution driver / configuration knobs that v2 only claimed
, eliminating v2's deadlock and paper features.

> Packaging: this SKILL.md is the WorkBuddy edition — the active manifest WorkBuddy loads.
> SKILL.en.md is the OpenClaw-compatible English edition, logically identical and differing only in
> manifest packaging and default execution backend. Both editions share the same scripts/, templates/,
> and references/, and select the sub-agent backend via config.yaml (subagent_mode: team on WorkBuddy).

0. Execution Backend (portable across platforms · M1)

config.yaml's execution.subagent_mode selects the sub-agent dispatch backend; the SKILL uses one
abstract vocabulary:

subagent_mode Platform Mechanism
team WorkBuddy TeamCreate parallel dispatch of dedicated sub-agents
agent OpenClaw Agent tool parallel dispatch (same model as current)
fork cross-session relay inherit/resume context (OpenClaw sessions_spawn context:"fork" / WorkBuddy fork)

The orchestrator only says "dispatch planner-agent / risk-agent …"; the platform maps that to the real
mechanism per subagent_mode. The SKILL no longer mixes "TeamCreate" and "Agent tool" wording (fixes v2 P3).

1. Core Iron Rules (non-negotiable)

# Rule Violation consequence
1 Every request must produce a file — no advice-only answers task considered incomplete
2 Locate or create project.yaml first — no source of truth, no execution flow cannot continue
3 Quality gate before delivery: consistency_check.py exit 0 blocks delivery
4 Stage transitions must pass stage gates: hard gates cannot be skipped state machine locks
5 Estimates must be numeric (>0): WBS/Backlog may not use "—" placeholder quality gate blocks
6 Don't mix methodology templates: waterfall → WBS/Gantt/stage-gates; agile → backlog/sprint/burndown deliverable invalid
7 Formal email needs approval: draft → Human approval → comm_send.py --approve cannot send externally
8 Program vs sub-project layering: program level only to sub-project milestones; sub-project detail stays down governance chaos
9 Domain activities need expert decomposition: WBS domain packages must carry role and leaf packages ≤ granularity_threshold person-days, else consistency gate is fatal (see Step 2.5) blocks delivery
10 Sub-agent output must pass subagent_check.py: non-conforming report → send back for fix blocks consolidation
11 Bottom-up authoring & rollup: plans/status/RAID/change-control are authored at the lowest owning unit (sub-project/SOW), the program level is a read-only scripted rollup (rollup_subprojects.py), never a hand-edited parallel source governance drift, false status
12 Every operational action must refresh its artifacts (OAG): in operational/monitoring, any change to project.yaml (status/EVM/RAID/WBS/actuals) MUST re-render the dependent deliverable(s) and run artifact_guard.py → exit 0. Stale/missing deliverables = guardrail breach, blocked at closeout and flagged RED by control_engine deliverable drift, false status

2. Enforced Workflow (run every time, no step skipping)

Step 0 · Locate the source of truth (mandatory first step)

IF /workspace/<slug>/project.yaml exists:
    → project_state.py migrate   # smooth v1.x -> v2 (adds _checkpoint / schema_version=2)
    → read project.yaml, confirm current state and _checkpoint.step
ELSE:
    → init_project.py "<name>" --type project|program --methodology <...> [--framework scrum|kanban]
    → confirm project.yaml created (schema_version=2, with _checkpoint)

Checkpoint: project_state.py exists is true; project.yaml readable via project_state.py show.

Step 1 · Four-dimension classification (mandatory second step)

From user input determine type(project/program) / methodology(waterfall/agile/iteration/hybrid)
/ phase(initiation/planning/execution/monitoring/closeout) / intent(plan/build/report/analyze/govern),
write into project.yaml.

Checkpoint: four dimensions written to project.yaml (e.g. project_state.py set project.methodology <x>).

Step 2 · Load methodology and phase

Per methodology+phase read references/methodology-<m>.md and references/phases/<phase>.md
(program → program-management.md; hybrid → also hybrid_playbook.md).

Step 2.5 · Expert dispatch (decompose WBS to leaf packages · mandatory, not skippable · fixes v2 deadlock)

WBS is not a PM-drafted SOW-level list; it is decomposed per domain by domain experts (Iron Rule #9):
1. planner-agent first produces SOW-level summary packages tagged with domain;
2. run dispatch.py --project <project.yaml> to generate the dispatch plan (flags packages missing role
/ over threshold, specializes recommended expert, marks already-compliant packages done to avoid
re-dispatch — idempotent);
3. for each pending package, dispatch the matching domain-expert sub-agent per references/expert-roles.md
system_prompt (or route to platform expert-center expert), decompose into leaf packages
(≤ control.granularity_threshold person-days, default 10, ID prefix SOW1.1) with role/domain/
owner/estimate/DoD/dependencies, write back to project.yaml.wbs;
4. rerun dispatch.py to confirm 0 pending.
> The consistency gate is fatal (exit 1) for domain activities missing role / over threshold; the
> orchestrator must not self-decompose to bypass it.

Step 3 · Decide execution mode

single deliverable / tweak / analysis script   → direct (do it yourself)
multiple independent deliverables (≥3, no deps) → team (parallel sub-agents, see §0 backend mapping)
needs context relay ("continue / pick up")      → fork (inherit context)

Don't team up needlessly: simple tasks are more reliable done directly.

Step 4 · Build deliverables (core execution)

Per methodology+intent produce deliverables; for each:

1. prepare data → <slug>_data.yaml
2. render.py --template <t> --data <slug>_data.yaml --out <path>   # must use render, not hand-write
3. write back project.yaml artifacts.<key>
4. run the relevant analysis script (see "Forced analysis" below)
5. project_state.py checkpoint "Step4-<intent>"   # record checkpoint

Forced analysis (not skippable):
- waterfall/hybrid planning → build_wbs.py + build_schedule.py [--level program|--sow <ID>] + schedule_health.py + build_sow_kickoff.py
- waterfall/hybrid execution/monitoring → evm.py (establish metrics.evm baseline first)
- before any delivery → consistency_check.py --project <project.yaml> (exit 0 to pass)
- after every operational action → artifact_guard.py --project <project.yaml> (exit 0; re-render dependent deliverable(s) if it flags drift). This is the OAG guardrail (Iron Rule #12) — non-negotiable in operational/monitoring.
- operational phase → execution_driver.py --project <yaml> drives execution list + self-checks patrol (control_engine triggers on cadence)

Post-deliverable check: consistency_check.py exit 0, else fix and re-pass.

Step 5 · Team up (team mode only)

Use the platform's parallel mechanism to dispatch sub-agents in the same message. Each sub-agent brief
must obey the JSON report contract in references/subagent-protocol.md; after output:

→ orchestrator collects each sub-agent's report JSON
→ run subagent_check.py --report <json> --project <yaml> for each
→ any failure → send the issue list back to that sub-agent to fix (A3 auto-retry)
→ all pass → orchestrator consolidates and writes project.yaml (avoids concurrent conflicts)

Checkpoint: all sub-agents' subagent_check.py exit 0.

Step 6 · Deliver

  1. consolidate all deliverables → update project.yaml artifacts index
  2. as needed render_docx.py to render formal documents
  3. report to user: deliverable list + key metrics card

3. Intent → Deliverable Routing

intent must produce analysis script
initiation charter + stakeholder + raci + communication_plan consistency_check
plan(waterfall) wbs + schedule_gantt + risk_register + raid_log + requirements_spec + quality_plan build_wbs + build_schedule + schedule_health + build_sow_kickoff
plan(agile) product_backlog + sprint_plan + dod + risk_register + raid_log consistency_check
plan(iteration) iteration_plan + iteration_backlog + risk_register consistency_check
plan(hybrid) hybrid_governance + macro_micro_map + wbs + schedule_gantt + micro-plan + risk_register build_wbs + build_schedule + schedule_health
plan(program) program_charter + portfolio_dashboard + dependency_map + benefits_realization + change_log consistency_check
execute/monitor status_report + burndown/control_report + update risk/raid evm + control_engine + execution_driver
closeout closure_report + lessons_learned control_engine exit 0
risk risk_register(5×5 calibrated) + raid_log consistency_check
change change_request + change_log consistency_check

4. Program-specific Rules

When type=program:
1. Program-level activities: program charter, portfolio dashboard, cross-project dependency map, benefits
realization plan → stay at program level
2. Sub-project activities: each sub-project's WBS/schedule/risk/status → stay inside the sub-project
3. Rolled up to program: sub-project milestone status, health, blockers, benefits progress
4. WBS granularity: program WBS → to sub-project milestone level (--level program doesn't expand leaves);
sub-project WBS → to week-level leaf packages (expert-decomposed)
5. Dispatch: program director (orchestrator) governs and triggers sub-agents to manage each sub-project
(rollup_subprojects.py consolidates cross-file; rollup_program_wbs.py for single-file two-tier)
6. Bottom-up rule (Iron Rule #11): plans/status/RAID/change-control are authored in each sub-project; the
program view is a read-only rollup. Never hand-edit program-level RAID/status/wbs_progress/ev/ac — fix
the source sub-project and re-run the rollup. See references/operation-model.md.

5. State Machine Discipline (Agent-layer _checkpoint lock · really wired)

planning → review → baselined → operational → closed
state allowed not allowed
planning plan, draft deliverables execution activities, EVM analysis
review stage-gate review modify baseline
baselined wait for control gate execution activities
operational deliver, monitor patrol, EVM analysis modify baseline (use change control)
closed read-only any modification

Transitions (hard gates via gate_engine.py + approval; soft gates PM-marked):
- planning→review: plan complete, consistency gate exit 0
- review→baselined: baseline.py --freeze
- baselined→operational: gate_engine.py --to execution --approve (hard gate; config.stage_gates can change)
- operational→closed: gate_engine.py --to closeout --approve (hard gate)
> _checkpoint.step records progress; illegal skips (e.g. operational before baseline) are rejected by the gate.

6. Script Quick Reference (all in <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/; fallback order: project_state maintains source →

render renders directly → pip install pyyaml)

script purpose when mandatory
init_project.py create project scaffold (schema v2) when no project.yaml
project_state.py read/write/migrate/checkpoint/read config any source-of-truth read/write, migrate, checkpoint
render.py render template to Markdown every deliverable
render_docx.py Markdown→DOCX when formal doc needed
consistency_check.py quality gate (exit 1=block; reads quality_gate.strict) before every delivery
artifact_guard.py OAG 运营期交付物护栏(内容哈希漂移检测;--stamp 为手工文档记录 source_hash) after every operational action / before delivery
critic_review.py WBS 拆解 Critic 自审(6 因素:scope/milestone/payment/assumptions/constraints/dependencies);规划期致命、运营期降级 after expert WBS decomposition, before consistency_check
dispatch.py expert dispatch plan (idempotent, marks done) before WBS decomposition (Step 2.5)
build_wbs.py render WBS view waterfall/hybrid planning
build_schedule.py WBS→schedule+Gantt (--level program/--sow <ID>) waterfall/hybrid planning
build_sow_kickoff.py per-SOW kickoff artifacts waterfall/hybrid planning
schedule_health.py critical path/float analysis waterfall/hybrid planning
evm.py earned value CPI/SPI execution/monitoring
baseline.py freeze plan as baseline before entering execution
control_engine.py periodic patrol vs baseline (writes last_control_check) during operational (cadence)
execution_driver.py execution driver (executable list + self patrol) during operational
gate_engine.py stage-gate evaluation/approval (reads config.stage_gates) on stage transition
subagent_check.py sub-agent output validation (contract) team-mode consolidation
comm_send.py email approval send formal external comms
rollup_program_wbs.py program WBS consolidation program planning

7. Reference Index (load on demand)

when needed read
current phase activities/deliverables references/phases/<phase>.md
methodology detail references/methodology-<methodology>.md
program management references/program-management.md
hybrid practice references/hybrid_playbook.md
multi-agent dispatch references/orchestration.md
sub-agent roles & briefs references/agents.md
domain expert roles references/expert-roles.md
activity→expert routing references/activity-expert-map.md
project.yaml field structure references/project-schema.md
risk 5×5 calibration references/risk-matrix.md
EVM/burndown metrics references/metrics.md
full template library references/templates-index.md
lifecycle state machine references/lifecycle.md
sub-agent comms protocol references/subagent-protocol.md
bottom-up authoring & rollup model references/operation-model.md
install config config.yaml
Chinese manual SKILL.md

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
pm-master怎么安装?

在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行:skillhub install user_f3be7ae7/pm-master-workbuddy。安装方式为未标注。装完刷新技能列表或重开客户端。

pm-master支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

pm-master权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

pm-master收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

pm-master用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。