pestel检索分析

SKILL效率
效率 未标注权限 许可证不明确
安装这个技能

一个面向中国市场研究的 PESTEL 战略情报分析 Skill,支持以战略决策为中心,优先检索国内官方来源、权威媒体 RSS/Feed、自有资料库和可信行业资料,并通过证据评分将原始信息转化为可执行的战略建议。

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

pestel检索分析是效率类的 Agent Skill,安装方式未标注,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,有可直接复制的安装命令。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类效率 安装方式未标注 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 未标注
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

未标注
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
skillhub install user_173b32ba/pestel-strategic-intelligence-cn
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    执行上面的命令安装;也可以把仓库里的 SKILL.md 手动放进客户端的 skills 目录。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

效率
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方user_173b32ba仓库 未标注 · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式未标注安装包 community
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 1791619724
正文体量14.2 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
整理待办与日程

把零散任务收进清单,排出优先级。

批量处理重复任务

把固定动作做成模板,重复执行。

把流程写成清单

把口头流程整理成可复用的步骤。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 有可直接复制的安装命令,不用自己翻文档找入口。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在效率场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
pestel检索分析当前 未标注权限 未标注 未标注 未标注 有
Nano PDF 文档 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 424.9 万 OpenClaw 有
自动更新程序 浏览器控制 ClawHub 市场 296.4 万 OpenClaw 有
Gemini 助手 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 254.7 万 OpenClaw 有
word DOCX 文档 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 239.6 万 OpenClaw 有
Excel XLSX 前端 联网访问 ClawHub 市场 227.0 万 OpenClaw 有

SKILL.md 全文

14.2 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

PESTEL Strategic Intelligence Skill for OpenClaw

Purpose

Use this skill to run decision-driven macro-environment research with the PESTEL framework and convert raw secondary data into strategic intelligence.

This skill is not for collecting general industry trends. It is for supporting a specific business, product, market, policy, or industry decision with traceable evidence.

This OpenClaw-ready version uses capability-based source routing. It does not require a fixed tool name. The agent should first decide which retrieval or analysis capability is needed, then choose the best available tool in the runtime that satisfies that capability.

Decision -> Missing Information -> Required Capability -> Best Available Tool -> Evidence Check -> Intelligence -> Action

Core Principle

Always begin with the decision, not with search.

Decision -> Missing Information -> PESTEL Map -> Capability Routing -> Targeted Collection -> Evidence Scoring -> Strategic Intelligence

Do not start with broad web discovery. Start from the decision, identify missing information, then route each missing information item to the highest-value available capability.


When to Use

Use this skill when the user needs to research an industry, market, product opportunity, startup idea, investment direction, policy risk, technology trend, or competitive environment.

Typical triggers:

  • "Analyze the macro environment for..."
  • "Help me research this industry with PESTEL..."
  • "What external factors affect this business decision?"
  • "Collect industry intelligence for..."
  • "Should we enter this market?"
  • "Use my database and RSS sources to research..."
  • "Monitor industry signals from reliable sources..."

Capability-Based Routing Policy

The skill must describe what capability is required, not which exact tool must be used.

A capability is an abstract function such as:

Capability Purpose Typical Implementations
Private knowledge retrieval Search the user's own materials first Local notes, uploaded files, Zotero exports, project reports, internal databases, indexed folders
Authoritative feed monitoring Find recent signals from configured trusted feeds RSS, RSSHub, regulator feeds, media feeds, research feeds, standards feeds
Official source lookup Verify policy, law, statistics, standards, and public institutional claims Government sites, statistical bureaus, legal databases, regulator portals, standards bodies
Industry report discovery Find market, business, and consulting evidence Market research reports, consulting publications, company filings, industry associations
Academic and patent discovery Check technical maturity and research direction Papers, conference proceedings, patents, institutional repositories
General web discovery Fill gaps and discover leads when higher-priority sources are insufficient Search engines, public pages, company websites, open directories
Evidence assessment Score retrieved evidence and record limitations Manual scoring, ranking model, source log, evidence matrix
Intelligence synthesis Convert evidence into implications and actions PESTEL matrix, decision options, recommendation report

The agent should inspect available tools in its runtime and choose the tool that best provides the required capability. If multiple tools provide the same capability, choose based on source authority, freshness, user authorization, precision, and ability to return citations or metadata.


Mandatory Source Priority Order

For every research task, follow this source order:

  1. User-owned knowledge base / private database
    - Local Markdown notes
    - Zotero exports
    - Project reports
    - Previous research database
    - Internal CSV / JSON / SQLite records
    - User-uploaded documents

  2. Configured authoritative feeds

  • For China-domestic research, prefer cn_* source groups in config/rss_sources.yml: official statistics, central government/ministry/regulator pages, central state media RSS, major news agency RSS, and reputable domestic finance/technology media feed routes.
  • The skill specifies feed capabilities and source requirements only; the runtime chooses the concrete RSS/feed retrieval tool or service.
  • If a feed is generated through RSSHub or another feed service, the original publisher and original URL remain the evidence source.
  • Government announcements
  • Industry regulators
  • Reputable financial and technology media
  • University or research institution updates
  • Standards organizations
  • Think tanks and international organizations
  1. Official and institutional sources
    - Government departments
    - Statistics bureaus
    - Regulatory bodies
    - Legal and standards databases
    - International organizations

  2. Industry reports and market research
    - Consulting firms
    - Market research platforms
    - Industry associations
    - Company annual reports and filings
    - Academic papers and conference papers

  3. General web discovery fallback
    - Use only when higher-priority sources are insufficient
    - Must be cross-checked with at least one stronger source when used for important claims

  4. LLM internal knowledge
    - Use only to explain frameworks or generate hypotheses
    - Never use as the sole factual basis for strategic conclusions

If higher-priority sources provide sufficient evidence, do not over-collect from lower-priority sources.


Runtime Tool Selection Rule

Before using any tool, the agent must state the required capability and selection reason.

Use this planning format:

decision_to_support:
key_pestel_dimensions:
missing_information:
required_capability:
source_tier_to_check_first:
tool_selection_criteria:
  - authority
  - freshness
  - relevance
  - user_authorization
  - citation_or_metadata_support
fallback_capability:
cross_validation_plan:
sufficient_evidence_threshold:

The agent should not hard-code a tool name in the plan. It should choose from whatever tools are available in the runtime.

Fallback Rule

If a capability is unavailable, move to the next suitable capability in the source priority order. If no retrieval capability is available, ask the user to provide sources or clearly mark the result as framework-only and not evidence-based.


Required Inputs

Before research, identify these fields. If the user does not provide them, infer a reasonable draft and clearly mark assumptions.

industry:
target_market:
decision_to_support:
time_horizon:
geography:
business_type:
known_constraints:
preferred_source_types:
private_knowledge_scope:
feed_scope:
output_depth:
Field Meaning
industry Sector or product category being researched
target_market Country, region, city tier, or customer segment
decision_to_support Strategic decision that research should support
time_horizon Short-term, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, etc.
geography Where the decision applies
business_type Startup, coursework project, corporate strategy, product launch, etc.
known_constraints Budget, regulation, technical capability, team capability, etc.
preferred_source_types Government, consulting reports, academic papers, market platforms, news, RSS, private notes
private_knowledge_scope Which internal folders, notes, documents, exports, or databases should be searched first
feed_scope Which configured feed groups to monitor, such as government, regulator, media, research, technology
output_depth Quick brief, detailed report, source log only, evidence matrix, or full strategic recommendation

PESTEL Missing Information Map

Break the decision into missing information questions.

Dimension Key Questions
Political Government priorities, subsidies, industrial policy, trade barriers, city pilots, public procurement
Economic Market size, purchasing power, cost structure, inflation, pricing, funding, investment signals
Social Demographics, lifestyle change, user acceptance, trust, cultural norms, public concerns
Technological Technical maturity, adoption rate, automation, AI, patents, standards, infrastructure readiness
Environmental Carbon goals, resource constraints, climate risk, ESG pressure, energy usage, sustainability claims
Legal Regulation, compliance, consumer protection, data privacy, labor law, safety standards, liability

Each missing information item must include:

id:
pestel_dimension:
research_question:
decision_relevance:
source_tier_to_check_first:
required_capability:
expected_evidence:
priority:
validation_requirement:

Evidence Scoring

Score each evidence item from 0 to 25.

Criterion Score Range Meaning
Source authority 0-5 Official, institutional, reputable, transparent source
Recency 0-5 Fresh enough for the decision time horizon
Decision relevance 0-5 Directly answers the decision or missing information question
Cross-source confirmation 0-5 Supported by independent sources
Data specificity 0-5 Concrete, quantitative, legally binding, case-specific, or methodologically clear
Total Score Tag Usage
21-25 Strong Evidence Can support main recommendation
16-20 Medium Evidence Can support secondary judgement
12-15 Weak Signal Mention with caution; not enough alone
0-11 Insufficient Do not use as basis for recommendation

High-impact recommendations require at least one strong evidence item or two independent medium evidence items. Legal and policy claims should be verified with official or regulatory evidence whenever possible.


Information-to-Intelligence Conversion

Do not stop at summarizing information. Convert information into intelligence.

For every important finding, produce:

raw_information:
source_type:
source_tier:
evidence_score:
limitation:
strategic_meaning:
decision_implication:
recommended_action:
confidence_level:

Example logic:

Information: A city released a pilot policy supporting autonomous delivery in semi-closed campuses.
Intelligence: This lowers regulatory uncertainty for campus-first MVP testing.
Action: Prioritize pilot cities with explicit smart logistics or robotics policy support.

Required Output Structure

For full tasks, output the following sections:

  1. Decision Context
  2. Assumptions and Constraints
  3. PESTEL Missing Information Map
  4. Capability Routing Plan
  5. Evidence Scorecard
  6. PESTEL Intelligence Matrix
  7. Source Log
  8. Strategic Options
  9. Recommended Action
  10. Remaining Unknowns and Next Data Collection Plan

For quick tasks, output:

  1. Decision being supported
  2. Top 3 missing information items
  3. Source/capability plan
  4. Key evidence found
  5. Strategic implication
  6. Next action

Capability Routing Plan Template

Missing Info ID PESTEL Required Capability First Source Tier Fallback Capability Selection Criteria Validation Plan
MI-001 Legal Official source lookup Official / institutional sources General web discovery Authority, recency, citation support Verify with regulator or legal source
MI-002 Technological Academic and patent discovery Industry reports / academic sources General web discovery Technical specificity, recency Cross-check with product or paper evidence
MI-003 Social Private knowledge retrieval User-owned knowledge base Authoritative feed monitoring Project relevance, source date Compare with external survey/report evidence

Source Log Template

Source Source Type Tier Date Access Capability Key Use Evidence Score Limitation Confidence

Use capability names in the Access Capability column, not specific tool names.


Guardrails

  • Do not produce strategic conclusions from a single weak or low-authority source.
  • Do not treat news signals as verified facts unless corroborated.
  • Do not use LLM memory as factual evidence.
  • Do not hide uncertainty. Mark assumptions, limitations, and confidence.
  • Do not over-search if enough high-priority evidence already exists.
  • Do not hard-code tool names; route by capability and let the runtime choose the implementation.

Suggested Skill Pack Files

SKILL.md
README.md
config/source_policy.yml
config/rss_sources.yml
config/evidence_scoring.yml
capabilities/private_knowledge_retrieval.md
capabilities/authoritative_feed_monitoring.md
capabilities/evidence_assessment.md
templates/pestel_brief_template.md
templates/intelligence_matrix.md
templates/search_task_template.md
templates/source_log.csv
templates/openclaw/retrieval_plan.md
templates/openclaw/source_router_task.md
templates/openclaw/evidence_scorecard.md
templates/openclaw/openclaw_prompt.md
examples/quadruped_robot_delivery_example.md

One-Shot Prompt Template

Act as my PESTEL Strategic Intelligence Agent.

Decision to support: [decision]
Industry: [industry]
Geography: [geography]
Time horizon: [time horizon]
Available source categories: [private knowledge, authoritative feeds, official sources, reports, academic sources, general web]

Rules:
1. Start from the decision.
2. Identify missing information using PESTEL.
3. For each missing information item, choose the required capability first, not a fixed tool.
4. Let the runtime select the best available tool for that capability.
5. Prioritize user-owned knowledge and authoritative feeds before general web discovery.
6. Verify legal, policy, statistical, and market-size claims with high-authority sources when possible.
7. Score evidence before making recommendations.
8. Convert raw information into strategic implications and recommended actions.

Output:
- Decision Context
- Capability Routing Plan
- PESTEL Intelligence Matrix
- Evidence Scorecard
- Source Log
- Strategic Options
- Recommended Next Step

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
pestel检索分析怎么安装?

在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行:skillhub install user_173b32ba/pestel-strategic-intelligence-cn。安装方式为未标注。装完刷新技能列表或重开客户端。

pestel检索分析支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

pestel检索分析权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

pestel检索分析收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

pestel检索分析用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。