OPC 安全巡检助手

SKILL运维和基础设施
运维和基础设施 未标注权限 许可证不明确
安装这个技能

给一人公司、独立开发者、小型 SaaS、网店、内容业务做非侵入式公开资产安全体检。亮点不是“扫漏洞”,而是把安全问题翻译成一个人能执行的修复计划:风险证据、业务影响、最小修复、耗时估计、7 天修复计划、30 天成熟度计划。

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

OPC 安全巡检助手是运维和基础设施类的 Agent Skill,安装方式未标注,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,有可直接复制的安装命令。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类运维和基础设施 安装方式未标注 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 未标注
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

未标注
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
skillhub install user_3b836107/opc-security-checkup
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    执行上面的命令安装;也可以把仓库里的 SKILL.md 手动放进客户端的 skills 目录。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

运维和基础设施
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方user_3b836107仓库 未标注 · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式未标注安装包 community
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 1791737197
正文体量5.1 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
查服务与日志

按现象定位服务状态与日志线索。

写部署与巡检脚本

把重复的部署、巡检写成脚本。

故障排查

按步骤排查网络、依赖与配置。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 有可直接复制的安装命令,不用自己翻文档找入口。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在运维和基础设施场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
OPC 安全巡检助手当前 未标注权限 未标注 未标注 未标注 有
Azure 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 664.2 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure diagnostics 问题管理 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 657.6 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure aigateway 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 655.3 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure AI 搜索 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 651.4 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure Cloud migrate 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 650.7 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有

SKILL.md 全文

5.1 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

OPC Security Checkup

Goal

Help one-person companies find the security issues that are most likely to hurt trust, launches, payments, signups, SEO, or customer support capacity. Keep the work defensive, lightweight, and owner-oriented: identify public exposure signals, explain business impact, and produce a prioritized remediation plan.

Do not attempt exploitation, authentication bypass, brute force, credential stuffing, intrusive scanning, destructive testing, or bypassing access controls. If ownership or permission is unclear, ask the user to confirm authorization before testing the asset.

Quick Workflow

  1. Confirm the target is owned or authorized when needed.
  2. Normalize targets into full URLs, preferring https://.
  3. Run the bundled script for public web checks:
python scripts/opc_security_checkup.py https://example.com --output report.md
  1. Read references/risk-playbook.md when interpreting results or adding manual findings.
  2. Produce a report with these sections:
    - Executive summary
    - Asset profile
    - Risk ranking
    - Findings with evidence
    - 7-day solo founder fix plan
    - 30-day maturity plan
    - Retest checklist

Use assets/report-template.md as the structure when the user wants a polished deliverable.

What To Check

Prioritize checks that matter for a tiny team:

  • Trust blockers: broken HTTPS, expired TLS, mixed redirects, missing security contact, obvious stack leakage.
  • Customer data exposure risk: weak cookie flags, missing HTTPS-only transport, permissive CORS if visible, public debug endpoints only when explicitly provided by the user.
  • Account and payment surface: signup/login/reset pages, admin paths disclosed by the user, webhook endpoints disclosed by the user.
  • Launch readiness: missing HSTS, missing CSP or weak CSP, missing clickjacking protection, overexposed server headers, missing security.txt.
  • Operational resilience: lack of backup/incident checklist, no dependency update routine, no owner-facing retest checklist.

Avoid low-signal filler. A missing header is not automatically critical. Tie severity to reachable functionality, data sensitivity, and solo-operator workload.

Using The Script

The script performs non-intrusive HTTP/TLS checks using Python standard library only. It checks:

  • DNS resolution
  • HTTP to HTTPS behavior
  • TLS certificate expiry
  • Redirect chain
  • Security headers
  • Cookie flags
  • Common public metadata endpoints: /robots.txt, /.well-known/security.txt, /sitemap.xml

Useful commands:

python scripts/opc_security_checkup.py https://example.com
python scripts/opc_security_checkup.py example.com app.example.com --output opc-report.md
python scripts/opc_security_checkup.py https://example.com --json output.json

If the script fails because of network policy or TLS errors, report the failure as evidence and continue with manual guidance rather than inventing results.

Reporting Style

Write in Chinese by default for Chinese users. Be concrete:

  • Say what was observed.
  • Explain why it matters to an OPC.
  • Give the smallest practical fix.
  • Mark owner effort: 15分钟, 半天, 1天, or 需要服务商.
  • Separate confirmed findings from recommended checks.

Severity guidance:

  • P0: Direct data exposure, credential leakage, payment/account takeover path, or active incident indicator.
  • P1: Likely exploitable misconfiguration on customer/account/payment surfaces.
  • P2: Trust or hardening gap with plausible abuse path.
  • P3: Hygiene issue or documentation/process gap.

For every finding, include:

### [P2] Finding title

- Evidence: observed URL/header/status/config.
- Impact: business and user risk.
- Fix: exact owner action.
- Retest: simple command or browser check.
- Effort: time estimate.

Manual Enrichment

When the user provides repository files, deployment notes, screenshots, or cloud settings, add manual checks:

  • .env, secrets, API keys, webhook secrets, OAuth callback URLs.
  • Auth/session settings, password reset flow, admin route protection.
  • Database exposure, storage bucket permissions, backup/restore process.
  • Payment webhook validation and idempotency.
  • Customer support incident script.

Keep manual checks scoped to provided materials. Do not claim external facts without evidence.

OPC Angle

Make the report useful for one person with limited time:

  • Rank fixes by risk reduction per hour.
  • Prefer managed controls when appropriate: CDN WAF, platform security headers, hosted auth, managed backups.
  • Include a launch gate: what must be fixed before public launch.
  • Include a recurring routine: monthly patch check, quarterly access review, incident contact update.

End with a short retest checklist the user can run after changes.

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
OPC 安全巡检助手怎么安装?

在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行:skillhub install user_3b836107/opc-security-checkup。安装方式为未标注。装完刷新技能列表或重开客户端。

OPC 安全巡检助手支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

OPC 安全巡检助手权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

OPC 安全巡检助手收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

OPC 安全巡检助手用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。