论文文献综述作者

SKILL研究检索

原名 thesis-literature-review-writer

研究检索 只读 许可证明确 OpenClaw
安装这个技能

thesis-literature-review-writer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

累计安装 685 本周 28
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 thesis-literature-review-writer
下载量 220 技能市场下载数
权限级别 只读 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证明确 MIT-0

安装

ClawHub 市场
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
openclaw skills install thesis-literature-review-writer

技能档案

研究检索
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方junwugit仓库 thesis-literature-review-writer · 版本 1.0.0
宿主客户端OpenClaw技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式ClawHub 市场安装包 junwugit/thesis-literature-review-writer
权限级别只读安装前请确认风险范围
许可证MIT-0许可证明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验2026-05-01上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 未标注
正文体量4.4 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

能做什么

5 项能力
上游给出的能力概览与适用场景
  • 按任务关键词查找相关 Skills
  • 展示可复制的安装命令
  • 保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验
  • 补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据
  • 展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果
OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

权限与风险

只读
装之前先读完这段

安装与使用指南

安装步骤

本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

怎么用

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;当前草稿只做目录说明,具体调用方式由规则抽取,异常条目再复核。

SKILL.md 全文

4.4 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

Thesis Literature Review Writer

Scope

Use this skill only to write the literature review part of a Chinese academic paper. The default output is a polished Chinese "第二章 文献综述" or "国内外研究现状" section.

Do not write the introduction, methodology, results, discussion, or conclusion chapters except for brief transitions that explain how the literature review supports the research problem, research questions, hypotheses, or study design.

Required Reference

Before drafting a full literature review, read references/literature-review-writing-guide.md. It contains the search logic, chapter structure, synthesis strategies, Chinese templates, citation safeguards, and method-specific adaptations derived from the local 2review.txt source.

Input Extraction

Extract and use any information the user provides:

  • Thesis title, research topic, or research problem
  • Discipline and degree level
  • Research type: quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, literature review, intervention-scheme design, theoretical analysis
  • Research object/population, setting, and data source
  • Variables, concepts, themes, theory/model, intervention framework, or mechanisms
  • Research questions, hypotheses, or research content
  • Supplied references, notes, article summaries, citation style, and required databases
  • School format requirements, word count, heading style, and domestic/foreign literature requirements

If the user does not provide references, draft with citation placeholders and recommend search terms. Do not invent exact references, author names, years, journal titles, findings, statistics, or DOI information.

Drafting Workflow

  1. Decide whether the user needs a full literature review chapter, a short "国内外研究现状" section, or one subsection.
  2. Identify the organizing principle:
    - By variables/concepts for quantitative studies
    - By themes/experiences/context for qualitative studies
    - By theory, mechanism, intervention components, and evaluation evidence for intervention-scheme papers
    - By search scope, themes, debates, and gaps for review papers
  3. Use a funnel structure: general literature first, then increasingly specific studies closest to the user's topic, population, method, and research questions.
  4. Be selective: emphasize sources directly related to the study; summarize tangential sources briefly or exclude them.
  5. Synthesize rather than list. Organize the chapter around concepts, theories, themes, trends, gaps, contradictory findings, practical significance, or continuing lines of inquiry.
  6. Include an introduction/advance organizer at the start of the chapter and a summary at the end.
  7. Use headings, subheadings, transitions, and topic sentences to make the review coherent.
  8. Use placeholders for missing citations and flag where the user must add real sources.

Output Standards

For a full literature review, include:

  • A concise note listing assumptions, missing references, and recommended search terms if needed
  • A complete Chinese draft with numbered headings
  • An opening paragraph that states the scope and sequence of the review
  • Thematic synthesis, not article-by-article annotation
  • Critical evaluation of existing research gaps, contradictions, methods, populations, and limitations
  • A short chapter summary that leads to the user's study
  • Citation placeholders when exact sources are unavailable

Quality requirements:

  • Every major subsection must connect to the research problem.
  • The chapter must not be a pile of "某某认为/某某发现" summaries.
  • Primary sources are preferred over secondary summaries.
  • The most relevant literature receives the most detailed coverage.
  • The summary should make the rationale for the user's research apparent.
  • The writing should be formal Chinese academic prose.

安全信息

审计结论
未标注不代表已通过审计
安全审计VirusTotal、ClawScan、Static analysis第三方安全审计平台给出的结论

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 2026-05-01。