头脑风暴

SKILL研究检索

原名 brainstorm

研究检索 只读 许可证不明确 CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI
安装这个技能

brainstorm 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

累计安装 269 本周 11
GitHub 星标 未标注 仓库 sugar
下载量 86 技能市场下载数
权限级别 只读 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 unknown

安装

GitHub 仓库
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
npx skills add https://github.com/scando1993/sugar --skill brainstorm

技能档案

研究检索
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方scando1993仓库 sugar · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式GitHub 仓库安装包 scando1993/sugar
权限级别只读安装前请确认风险范围
许可证unknown许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验2026-05-01上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 未标注
正文体量2.4 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

能做什么

4 项能力
上游给出的能力概览与适用场景
  • 按任务关键词查找相关 Skills
  • 展示可复制的安装命令
  • 保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验
  • 展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果
用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

权限与风险

只读
装之前先读完这段

安装与使用指南

安装步骤

本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

怎么用

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;当前草稿只做目录说明,具体调用方式由规则抽取,异常条目再复核。

SKILL.md 全文

2.4 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

Structured Brainstorming

Iron Law

DIVERGE BEFORE YOU CONVERGE

Phases

1. Diverge

Generate 10+ ideas without filtering. Quantity over quality at this stage.

  • Write every idea down, no matter how wild
  • No criticism, no evaluation, no "that won't work"
  • Build on previous ideas — combine, extend, invert
  • Include at least 2 unconventional or boundary-pushing ideas
  • Goal: fill the possibility space before narrowing

2. Cluster

Group ideas by theme or approach.

  • Identify natural groupings (e.g., "UI improvements", "backend optimizations", "new capabilities")
  • Label each cluster with a descriptive theme name
  • Note ideas that span multiple clusters — these are often the most interesting
  • Look for gaps: are there obvious clusters with no ideas?

3. Evaluate

Score each idea on three dimensions (1-5 scale):

Dimension 1 5
Feasibility Requires new infrastructure, unknown tech, or months of work Can be built with current stack in days
Impact Marginal improvement, few users affected Transformative for core use case, affects all users
Effort Large team, long timeline, high coordination Solo developer, short timeline, self-contained

Calculate a composite score: (Feasibility + Impact) - Effort

Rank all ideas by composite score.

4. Converge

Select the top 3 ideas and for each provide:

  • Summary: One-sentence description
  • Why this one: What makes it high-value
  • Risks: What could go wrong or block progress
  • Next steps: 2-3 concrete actions to move forward
  • Dependencies: What needs to exist before this can start

Red Flags — If You Catch Yourself Thinking:

Thought Reality
"We only need 3-4 good ideas" You need 10+ raw ideas to find 3 good ones. Diverge FIRST.
"That idea is unrealistic, skip it" Write it down anyway. Unrealistic ideas inspire realistic ones.
"I can evaluate while brainstorming" Evaluation kills creativity. Diverge and evaluate are SEPARATE phases.
"The first idea is obviously the best" The first idea is the most obvious, not the best. Keep generating.

Rules

  • Generate 10+ ideas before evaluating ANY of them
  • No criticism or filtering during the Diverge phase
  • Give every idea equal initial weight — do not pre-rank
  • Output a ranked list with scores, risks, and next steps for the top 3

安全信息

审计结论
未标注不代表已通过审计
安全审计Gen Agent Trust Hub、Socket、Snyk第三方安全审计平台给出的结论

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 2026-05-01。