进行用户访谈

SKILL研究检索

原名 conducting-user-interviews

研究检索 只读 许可证不明确 CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI
安装这个技能

conducting-user-interviews 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

累计安装 710 本周 29
GitHub 星标 3 仓库 skills
下载量 230 技能市场下载数
权限级别 只读 安装前请确认风险范围
许可证 许可证不明确 unknown

安装

GitHub 仓库
在支持 Skills 的客户端里执行,装完问一句「你有哪些技能」验证
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill conducting-user-interviews

技能档案

研究检索
字段来自技能仓库与公开索引,中文说明由本站标注
作者 / 维护方oldwinter仓库 skills · 版本 未标注
宿主客户端Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI技能可被这些客户端加载
安装方式GitHub 仓库安装包 oldwinter/skills
权限级别只读安装前请确认风险范围
许可证unknown许可证不明确,商用前请自行确认条款
仓库可用性available技能仓库当前是否可访问
最近核验2026-05-01上游最后核验时间 · 数据更新 未标注
正文体量7.8 KBSKILL.md 原文大小,越大说明说明书写得越细

能做什么

4 项能力
上游给出的能力概览与适用场景
  • 按任务关键词查找相关 Skills
  • 展示可复制的安装命令
  • 保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验
  • 展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果
用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

权限与风险

只读
装之前先读完这段

安装与使用指南

安装步骤

本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

怎么用

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;当前草稿只做目录说明,具体调用方式由规则抽取,异常条目再复核。

SKILL.md 全文

7.8 KB
模型实际读到的说明书原文,来自技能仓库

Conducting User Interviews

Scope

Covers

  • Planning an interview study that supports a specific product decision
  • Recruiting the right participants (including early adopters when appropriate)
  • Running interviews that capture specific stories and behaviors (not opinions)
  • Synthesizing interviews into actionable insights, opportunities, and next steps
  • Creating a lightweight “customer panel” habit for fast follow-ups

When to use

  • “Create a discussion guide for discovery interviews.”
  • “Recruit and run 8 user interviews about onboarding / activation.”
  • “We need to understand why users switched (or churned) — run switch interviews.”
  • “Help me synthesize interviews into insights + opportunities.”
  • “I’m a PM and need to run customer conversations next week.”

When NOT to use

  • You primarily need quantitative evidence (survey/experiment/analytics) or statistical confidence
  • You’re doing usability testing with task-based evaluation as the main output (different protocol)
  • You’re working with high-risk populations or sensitive topics (medical, legal, minors) without appropriate approvals/training
  • You have no decision to support (you’ll produce anecdotes without impact)

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Product + target user/customer segment (who, context of use)
  • The decision the interviews should inform (e.g., positioning, onboarding redesign, roadmap bet)
  • Interview type: discovery / JTBD switch / churn / concept test (or “recommend”)
  • Target participants (role, behaviors, situation, recency) + “who NOT to interview”
  • Constraints: number of interviews, time box, language/region, recording allowed, incentives (if any)

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
  • If answers aren’t available, proceed with explicit assumptions and label unknowns.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a User Interview Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):

  1. Context snapshot (goal, decision, hypotheses, constraints)
  2. Recruiting plan (channels, outreach copy, scheduling logistics) + screener
  3. Interview guide (script + question bank + probes) + consent/recording plan
  4. Note-taking template + tagging scheme
  5. Synthesis report (themes, evidence, opportunities, recommendations, confidence)
  6. Follow-up plan (thank-you, keep-in-touch, “customer panel” list/cadence)
  7. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Frame the decision and choose interview type

  • Inputs: Context + references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Define the decision, what you need to learn (unknowns), and pick the interview type (discovery vs switch vs churn vs concept).
  • Outputs: Context snapshot + study intent.
  • Checks: You can answer: “What will we do differently after these interviews?”

2) Define participant criteria (who/when/why) and sampling plan

  • Inputs: Target segment, product context, constraints.
  • Actions: Specify inclusion/exclusion criteria; prioritize recency (recent switch/churn/attempt) when relevant; decide sample mix (e.g., 6 core + 2 edge cases).
  • Outputs: Participant profile + sampling plan.
  • Checks: Criteria are behavior/situation-based (not demographic proxies).

3) Create recruiting plan + screener + outreach copy

  • Inputs: Participant profile; available channels (CRM, support, community, ads, LinkedIn).
  • Actions: Draft outreach messages, a screener, and scheduling logistics. Expect high drop-off; plan volume accordingly.
  • Outputs: Recruiting plan + screener + outreach copy.
  • Checks: Screener screens for the story you need (recency, context, alternatives), not “interest in our product.”

4) Draft the interview guide (story-first)

  • Inputs: Interview type + hypotheses/unknowns.
  • Actions: Build a guide that elicits specific stories (“last time…”) and avoids leading questions. Include probes, pivots, and time boxes. Add consent/recording script.
  • Outputs: Interview guide + consent/recording plan.
  • Checks: At least 70% of questions ask about past behavior and concrete examples.

5) Run interviews + capture clean notes (PM/Design present)

  • Inputs: Guide, logistics, notes template.
  • Actions: Run the session, follow the story, and capture verbatims. If possible, have PM + design observe live (or listen to recordings) to avoid secondhand dilution.
  • Outputs: Completed notes per interview + key quotes + immediate highlights.
  • Checks: Each interview yields 2–5 “story moments” (trigger → struggle → workaround → outcome).

6) Debrief immediately and normalize evidence

  • Inputs: Interview notes, recordings/transcripts (if any).
  • Actions: Do a 10–15 min debrief right after each interview: surprises, hypotheses updates, follow-ups. Tag notes consistently.
  • Outputs: Debrief bullets + tagged notes.
  • Checks: Unclear claims are marked as “needs follow-up” instead of treated as facts.

7) Synthesize across interviews into themes and opportunities

  • Inputs: Tagged notes across interviews.
  • Actions: Cluster by outcomes/struggles; capture contradictions; quantify lightly (counts) without over-claiming. Translate insights into opportunities and recommendations with confidence levels.
  • Outputs: Synthesis report + opportunity list.
  • Checks: Every major insight has at least 2 supporting interviews (or is labeled “single anecdote”).

8) Share, decide, follow up, and run the quality gate

  • Inputs: Draft pack.
  • Actions: Produce a shareable readout, propose next steps, and create a lightweight customer panel habit (5–10 engaged users). Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md.
  • Outputs: Final User Interview Pack + Risks/Open questions/Next steps.
  • Checks: Stakeholders can restate (a) key learning, (b) decision implication, (c) what happens next.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (Discovery): “I’m redesigning onboarding for a B2B product. Create a recruiting plan + discussion guide for 8 discovery interviews with new trial users.” Expected: participant criteria, outreach + screener, discovery guide, notes template, synthesis plan, and a ready-to-run pack.

Example 2 (Switch/JTBD): “We lose deals to spreadsheets. Run switch interviews to learn what triggers teams to move off spreadsheets and what they try instead.” Expected: switch interview guide (timeline + forces), recruiting criteria emphasizing recency, and a synthesis structure that outputs ‘push/pull/anxieties/habits’.

Boundary example: “Ask users what features they want and build whatever they say.” Response: redirect to story-based interviewing; clarify decision context; avoid feature-request interviews without behavioral grounding.

安全信息

审计结论
未标注不代表已通过审计
安全审计Gen Agent Trust Hub、Socket、Snyk第三方安全审计平台给出的结论

热门专题

按场景挑技能
全部专题 →

技能内容以作者仓库为准;分类、权限级别与许可证状态的中文说明为中文整理,最近核验 2026-05-01。